Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Mazda exports CX-5s from Malaysia and China. I have no idea of whether TTO vehicles are all Japanese manufactured or not.agent007 wrote:Observe the Kia's on the road and you would notice many have blown bulbs/LEDs. Now blown bulbs/LEDs is not just a Kia thing I admit, but I'm seeing a trend with late model vehicles with blown bulbs and they're mostly Kia's. Apart from the bulb issue, they just don't age well.
Admittedly, the Tucson and Sportage are quite attractive when sitting in a showroom but as you buy it and begin to own it, you would want to bail out sooner rather than later. Now a CX5 is no RAV4 but this one especially these modern Mazdas, they're well-built precision engineered (still made in good ole Japan) vehicles and it is on this note, between the 3 you mentioned, it goes without saying any further what my pick would be.
agent007 wrote:Observe the Kia's on the road and you would notice many have blown bulbs/LEDs. Now blown bulbs/LEDs is not just a Kia thing I admit, but I'm seeing a trend with late model vehicles with blown bulbs and they're mostly Kia's. Apart from the bulb issue, they just don't age well.
Admittedly, the Tucson and Sportage are quite attractive when sitting in a showroom but as you buy it and begin to own it, you would want to bail out sooner rather than later. Now a CX5 is no RAV4 but this one especially these modern Mazdas, they're well-built precision engineered (still made in good ole Japan) vehicles and it is on this note, between the 3 you mentioned, it goes without saying any further what my pick would be.
As a past owner of 2 Rav 4s I would say that the CX5 beats it in interior, exterior quality, performance, features and style.agent007 wrote:Observe the Kia's on the road and you would notice many have blown bulbs/LEDs. Now blown bulbs/LEDs is not just a Kia thing I admit, but I'm seeing a trend with late model vehicles with blown bulbs and they're mostly Kia's. Apart from the bulb issue, they just don't age well.
Admittedly, the Tucson and Sportage are quite attractive when sitting in a showroom but as you buy it and begin to own it, you would want to bail out sooner rather than later. Now a CX5 is no RAV4 but this one especially these modern Mazdas, they're well-built precision engineered (still made in good ole Japan) vehicles and it is on this note, between the 3 you mentioned, it goes without saying any further what my pick would be.
zando wrote:Scotty kilmer says Mazda good, Nissan bad, Honda good and Toyota is best lmaoo let's not mention euros and american brands even though I have a Chevy lol
Gladiator wrote:As a past owner of 2 Rav 4s I would say that the CX5 beats it in interior, exterior quality, performance, features and style.
The only thing the Rav 4 has is the local fan base and that enhances the resale value.
Gladiator wrote:zando wrote:Scotty kilmer says Mazda good, Nissan bad, Honda good and Toyota is best lmaoo let's not mention euros and american brands even though I have a Chevy lol
Yeah I know a guy that purchased a Prado from the firm, boasted that Toyota is the best an there is nothing that could compare. Under warranty had to pull down the entire dash and change out leaking AC evaporator and change one shock. As soon as warranty finish AC evaporator gone again, all shocks gone, he catch Toyota putting used brake pads instead of new. Now there is a crashing sound coming from the transmission whenever he mash brakes.
MaxPower wrote:Gladiator wrote:As a past owner of 2 Rav 4s I would say that the CX5 beats it in interior, exterior quality, performance, features and style.
The only thing the Rav 4 has is the local fan base and that enhances the resale value.
Gladz,
What model Rav 4s you had?
Gladiator wrote:As a past owner of 2 Rav 4s I would say that the CX5 beats it in interior, exterior quality, performance, features and style.agent007 wrote:Observe the Kia's on the road and you would notice many have blown bulbs/LEDs. Now blown bulbs/LEDs is not just a Kia thing I admit, but I'm seeing a trend with late model vehicles with blown bulbs and they're mostly Kia's. Apart from the bulb issue, they just don't age well.
Admittedly, the Tucson and Sportage are quite attractive when sitting in a showroom but as you buy it and begin to own it, you would want to bail out sooner rather than later. Now a CX5 is no RAV4 but this one especially these modern Mazdas, they're well-built precision engineered (still made in good ole Japan) vehicles and it is on this note, between the 3 you mentioned, it goes without saying any further what my pick would be.
The only thing the Rav 4 has is the local fan base and that enhances the resale value.
carluva wrote:It will be interesting to know what market research was done prior to introducing MG on the market.
Didn't Massy learn a hard lesson with the failure of the VW brand here? And what about Fiat's "success" by Sterling (??? I'm not sure here but correct me if I am wrong). As someone mentioned earlier, surely Massy should have introduced something more "known" to our market. Or perhaps expand their portfolio into more models from Nissan or Subaru.
There are enough CUVs and SUVs on our market... Someone needs to be a trendsetter, step outside of the box and put a minivan out there (think Honda Odyssey or Nissan Elgrand). I am sure that persons would bite. I would for an Odyssey.
PS: the MG vehicles do look quite attractive on the exterior.
Habit7 wrote:I don't understand why ppl are buying so much Jeeps, they will regret it soon.
worksux101 wrote:Habit7 wrote:I don't understand why ppl are buying so much Jeeps, they will regret it soon.
Been saying this for awhile. They look great but have a very poor reliability record for long term ownership.
carluva wrote:Really? Does that comment apply to the Wranglers and the Rubicons or the SUVs like the Compass and the Cherokees or all the Jeeps on the whole?worksux101 wrote:Habit7 wrote:I don't understand why ppl are buying so much Jeeps, they will regret it soon.
worksux101 wrote:Habit7 wrote:I don't understand why ppl are buying so much Jeeps, they will regret it soon.
Been saying this for awhile. They look great but have a very poor reliability record for long term ownership.
agent007 wrote:VW in T&T is almost a non existent brand. They flopped big time. The odd Tiguan or Amarok sale is not sufficient enough imo. They probably make more money servicing the vehicles than actual vehicle sales. Being a VW, you all know that repairs is a common thing associated with that brand. It's like chip board that got water soaked...problems for so.
Jaguar/Land Rover (JLR) probably makes more money servicing vehicles than actual sales (see VW comments above).
Ford hanging on with the odd Ranger sale. Someone has to be mentally insane to look at an EcoSport and say, yep that's my next ride.
Chevrolet may be exiting RHD markets on a whole (they already pulled out many RHD nations).
Jeep is on a high right now for the first time ever in our market. Good for them! You can get a mud loving Wrangler for over $300k less than a Prado and $200k less than a Fortuner. No wonder why you see a lot now on the roads.
Volvo, like JLR is a niche brand with the odd sale here and there. Not to be taken seriously.
BAIC is selling 1 model here and even that is a struggle. Like JAC, Foton, Go Now, Yuejin and DFM vehicles sold here....the original owners will have to keep them for life because they not resaleable. Buy, drive and then tow to scrap iron dealer.
Fiat, Seat, Skoda, Peugeot, Renault, Citroen, Opel/Vauxhall, Ssang Yong, Mahindra and Tata downright failed locally.
MG being reintroduced into T&T is not the true MG once from the UK (not like this means anything anyway cause original MG's were garbage. Even Brits think so too hence the failure just like Rover).
MG the Marque is owned by the Chinese. The basis of these vehicles are based on other Chinese engineered and built vehicles. That MG ZS crossover is better suited against the BAIC x25. A disposable garbage Kia Seltos is a far superior vehicle over those 2 I just mentioned (if a 3rd world Seltos could actually be better than something, tell yuhself how inferior that ZS and x25 really is).
There is a possibility these MG vehicles will end up just like a Datsun Cross. Enter the market, flopped and will dissappear for good. People into back road agriculture are ideal candidates for these disposable vehicles. When they fail in a couple of years, simply cut out the entire roof section and use it to transport tools and produce with a Nissan implanted engine/transmission of course.
Gladiator wrote:The MG HS is a very interesting car... I have been looking at reviews online and it seems to be a favorite in Oceania and environs. The features and interior trim is almost like a Mercedes (exaggeration I know). I think it can do well, but depends on how well Massy supports it.
The fully loaded SUV is $254k not bad for a 1.5Turbo with DCT. That's the price of the highest Vitara you can find but the MG has 10X the features, tech and some more HP to boot.
The red is a sweet colour too...
agent007 wrote:Gladiator, okay you've got me. I'll be googling that vehicle some more.
Carluva, a couple years back, there was a discussion here on the 1KD vs the 1GD. Turns out at no surprise really, based on the diesel we get, the summary of the discussions right here on this site points to better longevity and reliability from the KD vs the newer GD. Checks reveal that the KD was better suited to our farm diesel with Euro 3-5 compliance. The GD however is for Euro 6 compliance.
I gather, its not that the engine is bad, the point is, how well it will perform as the engine ages based on the fuel injected into it.
I also heard amongst some Hilux fanatics that the previous 5AT transmissions are bullet proof compared to the new 6AT's.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests