Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:any views on the wrangler??
Rory Phoulorie wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:any views on the wrangler??
Not worth it in my opinion. You would be better off with a Defender for less money.
DJ Q wrote:Same as the sedan.
I believe it's $195K basic and $215K fully loaded.
Not 100% on those figures though
acesinghit wrote:Despite the poor crash safety of the Cerato sedan at least Kia packs a lot of features in their cars to woo buyers. I must hand it to them, all it missing now is an option for leather and sunroof.
For those who follow the international motoring press:
2016 MotorTrend awards:
Truck of the Year: Chevrolet Colorado
Car of the Year: Chevrolet Camaro
SUV of the Year: Volvo XC90
Car And Driver 2016 10 Best List:
BMW M235i
Cadillac CTS V-Sport
Chevrolet Camaro
Ford Shelby Mustang GT350
Honda Accord
Mazda 3
Mazda MX-5 Miata
Porsche Boxster/Cayman
Tesla Model S 70/70D
Volkswagen Golf/GTI/Golf R
Maybe this should influence us in our buying decisions..
wing wrote:And little Mazda with 2 vehicles....
drchaos wrote:Since Mazda ditched their partnership with ford they back to being reliable. New skyactive engines, transmissions and design in general is really holding up. Saw a vid where a german team broke down a CX-5 after 100K km's and looked at the every part. Their conclusion was that it was built to last.
bess almera wrote:Suzuki Vitara (NOT Grand Vitara) looks neat and compact.
*KRONIK* wrote:bess almera wrote:Suzuki Vitara (NOT Grand Vitara) looks neat and compact.
Do they have it on display now?
*KRONIK* wrote:bess almera wrote:Suzuki Vitara (NOT Grand Vitara) looks neat and compact.
Do they have it on display now?
bess almera wrote:*KRONIK* wrote:bess almera wrote:Suzuki Vitara (NOT Grand Vitara) looks neat and compact.
Do they have it on display now?
Pics?
Still on port....waiting to be cleared.
drchaos wrote:I am confused as to the need for a vitara ... it competes with the s cross
Rory Phoulorie wrote:drchaos wrote:I am confused as to the need for a vitara ... it competes with the s cross
S Cross is not available in 4WD. Probably the S Cross may cut into the 2WD Vitara's sales if they are indeed bringing 2WD Vitaras.
I really have no idea why people buy a 2WD "SUV" when they could just buy a Wingroad, AD Wagon or Fielder for less money and the same functionality. Someone explain this to me please. Thanks.
drchaos wrote:I think its always a good idea to purchase vehicles that were built in technologically advanced societies with a disciplined and skilled workforce.
You know what countries those other dealers getting their pickups from?
drchaos wrote:I think its always a good idea to purchase vehicles that were built in technologically advanced societies with a disciplined and skilled workforce.
You know what countries those other dealers getting their pickups from?
Rory Phoulorie wrote:drchaos wrote:I am confused as to the need for a vitara ... it competes with the s cross
S Cross is not available in 4WD. Probably the S Cross may cut into the 2WD Vitara's sales if they are indeed bringing 2WD Vitaras.
I really have no idea why people buy a 2WD "SUV" when they could just buy a Wingroad, AD Wagon or Fielder for less money and the same functionality. Someone explain this to me please. Thanks.
cinco wrote:Rory Phoulorie wrote:drchaos wrote:I am confused as to the need for a vitara ... it competes with the s cross
S Cross is not available in 4WD. Probably the S Cross may cut into the 2WD Vitara's sales if they are indeed bringing 2WD Vitaras.
I really have no idea why people buy a 2WD "SUV" when they could just buy a Wingroad, AD Wagon or Fielder for less money and the same functionality. Someone explain this to me please. Thanks.
I don't get why people buy 4wd suvs to drive on the road every day. Just adding extra maintenance for absolutely no reason. Worse gas mileage more weight more maintenance for no reason
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests