TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
:shock: @ Mazda 6
agent007 wrote:The 2013 Mazda 6 reboot this time in the most fully equipped trim you can possibly import:
The 2.5 model and believe you me this midsizer sports sedan is pure over-kill over the likes of the Camry, Accord, Teana, Legacy, Sonata, Optima and Passat. It may not be as fast as an Accord V6 or a Legacy Turbo but those cars are upwards of half-a-million dollars. At $372k Vat inclusive this Mazda is all about the best handling car in its class and plenty zoom zoom for the money.
Go check it out in the POS showroom, meanwhile these are some amateur cell phone pics:
The engineering that went into the platform and overall design of this car will make the Audi A4 and Volvo S60 blush. It'll take Kia and Hyundai another generation or two to reach this.
With 185hp and 250Nm torque it can scoot to 100kmph in just over 7 seconds and cover the 1/4 mile in just under 16 seconds. That is Mercedes Benz E250 territory as well as that of BMW 520i and Audi A6 2.0T. It's also faster than the Audi A4 1.8T; BMW 316i; Mercedes Benz C180 and CLA200.
Features Summary:
-All independent suspension sport tuned
-skyactiv 2.5 with super fast skyactiv transmission (with paddle shift). (direct injection with intake and exhaust VVT)
-i-ELOOP technology (brake energy regeneration system)
-i-stop technology (idling stop technology)
-leather seats
-front power seats with memory
-dual zone auto climate control
-sunroof
-concert hall quality BOSE 9 speaker traffic defeater
-19" rims
-all wheel disc brakes with a soup of safety features including ABS, EBD, EBA, TCS, DSC etc etc
-front, side and curtain protection airbags
-steering wheel controls for audio, cruise and Bluetooth
-front and rear parking assist with backup camera
-bi-xenon auto lights with cornering function and LED DRL's
-LED tail lights
-proximity key with push button start
-auto speed sensitive wipers
-trip computer
-dual chrome exhaust
-compatible with both super and premium fuel (premium recommended though with 800kms per tank range capability)
j.o.e wrote:Hmmm small hatchback against full sized sedan. That's a legit comparison.
S_2NR wrote:j.o.e wrote:Hmmm small hatchback against full sized sedan. That's a legit comparison.
He's talking about the A3 sedan
S_2NR wrote:j.o.e wrote:Hmmm small hatchback against full sized sedan. That's a legit comparison.
He's talking about the A3 sedan
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:S_2NR wrote:j.o.e wrote:Hmmm small hatchback against full sized sedan. That's a legit comparison.
He's talking about the A3 sedan
I'm guessing the S in your username doesn't stand for Sharp.
S_2NR wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:S_2NR wrote:j.o.e wrote:Hmmm small hatchback against full sized sedan. That's a legit comparison.
He's talking about the A3 sedan
I'm guessing the S in your username doesn't stand for Sharp.
Wow. Such maturity.
Isn't the purpose of a forum to share, discuss and learn new things?
If you know better, you should share your knowledge instead of cheap attacks.
j.o.e wrote:Poster also said he bought the sportback.i don't think Audi stopped using that as the hatchback designation. I get that everyone loves their purchases but the comparisons across classes are non-sensical sometimes. It would be more helpful if ppl said i took the Passat over the 6 because.........
A3 sportback is a lovely car, but clearly you were buying the best that 300k could buy possibly, but not shopping for a mid-sized sedan specifically.
Next time somebody does that I'm gonna say that the GTR was too expensive so I got a Wingroad like a bawse
cinco wrote:Interior space was not an issue for you?
Everyone with a vigo could be in an A3 too
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:S_2NR wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:S_2NR wrote:j.o.e wrote:Hmmm small hatchback against full sized sedan. That's a legit comparison.
He's talking about the A3 sedan
I'm guessing the S in your username doesn't stand for Sharp.
Wow. Such maturity.
Isn't the purpose of a forum to share, discuss and learn new things?
If you know better, you should share your knowledge instead of cheap attacks.
Fella I could not care less what you think of my maturity. Yet again you put your foot in your mouth and yet again you backpedal. Your posts usually are some un-researched, knee jerk cynical drivel which adds nothing to most debates.
Anyways it wouldn't even matter if one was comparing an A3 sedan in this instance. Totally different classes in terms of cabin size, trunk space, etc.
It's like saying one would by the A3 over the A6 cuz it's cheaper.
mazdabishi wrote:cinco wrote:Interior space was not an issue for you?
Everyone with a vigo could be in an A3 too
interior space is absolutely fine...comfortably seats 6 foot adults in the front and rear seats at the same time.....
...I have the "police" mazda 6 with a ton load more interior space if I need it
DJ Q wrote:^Be careful comparing an A4's leg room to a Sylphy's Leg room.
Comparison police might say you can't compare a RORO leg room to a new car's leg room
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests
