TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
It's under 45k and it has AC 
gracen wrote:Why not get a box lancer
sliderz1 wrote:gracen wrote:Why not get a box lancer
not to mention the typical essar twenny tobo
gracen wrote:DSM_05 wrote:BTW it's a 6 speed CVT
a cvt has no "speeds". It has no gears as it CONTIUOUSLY varies it's ratios.
the 6 speeds are "simulated" where the tcu sets the transmission to run certain preset ratios to mimic a 6 speed transmission - that happenbs when the driver chooses tiptronic mode.Talking about drive, the Lancer certainly drives well; in fact, it drives too well, till the point that I didn’t even notice the gear shift. The car felt like its gearbox had only 1 speed as there were no jolts during shifts, but in actual fact, it’s a 6-speed CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission) paired with Mitsubishi’s INVECS-III (Intelligent & Innovative Vehicle Electronic System), a system that automatically selects the optimal gear ratio based on driving style and road conditions. This setup contributed greatly to the fuel efficiency of the car, and it is apparent in our tests as the full tank of petrol lasted us for over 500km, despite our aggressive driving style, where we pushed the car beyond the 160km/h mark. Even at such speeds, cabin comfort is rather impressive, as engine, road and wind noise were reduced to acceptable levels thanks to the cabin insulation, making long haul journeys more pleasant. Handling however, was a little nervous at those speeds; though it can’t be blamed as we aren’t supposed to be traveling that fast to begin with. Around the city, the suspension performed gracefully, though the occasional bumps were felt, no thanks to the road works department. Given the road conditions in our country, the Lancer certainly cushioned the ride significantly. Why do I say this? Because in another car on the same stretch road, I felt like I was in a train.
http://www.zerotohundred.com/newforums/features/96077-test-mitsubishi-lancer-glx-1-6-a.html
I was trying to show him what the article said about the 6-speed CVT. Thanks for the links though 
A172 wrote:stopped reading thread after some phaggot mentioned being impressed in higher RPM's by a CS3 Lancer.
definitely a "O/D on-off" specialist A172 wrote:stopped reading thread after some phaggot mentioned being impressed in higher RPM's by a CS3 Lancer.
AllTrac wrote:A172 wrote:stopped reading thread after some phaggot mentioned being impressed in higher RPM's by a CS3 Lancer.
A172 wrote:AllTrac wrote:A172 wrote:stopped reading thread after some phaggot mentioned being impressed in higher RPM's by a CS3 Lancer.
5minute 0-180 jivist
sliderz1 wrote:btw the CS2A's i speak of came in the garage for regular, up to date maintaince..............they were GDI
like i said the CS3A's are better
ronsin.............is onli mitubishi u have awah??
yvan300 wrote:Hhahah, man call a box lancer yes
Buh wam to honda? Up to now no one mentioned the civic! lolz
Like people does avoid them like the plague awa?
gracen wrote:
gracen wrote:
A172 wrote:dan these grounding kit veterans honestly believe because Mitsubishi manufactures the Evo, their econoboxes 'share the same roots'.....i sh1t you not.
yvan300 wrote:Lolz what about a stock civic. The ek model? How much for body parts? Are they reliable? How much more money you gotta fork out to buy parts for them as compared to the cedia or a b15. And how many kilometers can you get off a full tank?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests
