TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Captainzaak wrote:cacasplat3 wrote:zoom rader wrote:Captainzaak wrote:cacasplat3 wrote:was thinking about this the other day........they dont charge cyclists for passing cars that stopped in traffic.....so why charge motorcyclists? bicycles are considered vehicles, so then cyclists are just as guilty...........of course i dont have the two wrongs make a right argument........i'm thinking that if yur going to enforce that law, do it across the board.......
I think the argument to that would be that one, cyclist aren't allowed to ride on the highway in the first place, but they do it anyone.
Two, they are unlicensed, hence not considered vehicles by law.
Motorbikes are licensed and must ad hear to the rules of the road.
Try riding your motorbike up a on way street nah, see if police eh stop you.
Dude cyclist are allowed to ride on the highway, but only Racing licensed cyclist
they are also required to follow the rules of the road......although its not enforced, bicycles are supposed to follow the flow of traffic i.e. ride on the left of the road and adhere to one ways.......
Always thought they were not allowed.
(seeing that sign on the highway saying " NO mopeds, dogs, bicycles etc allowed on highway reinforced it that thought)
Motorist don't even adhere to the road rules, bicycles will?
zoom rader wrote:Captainzaak wrote:cacasplat3 wrote:zoom rader wrote:Captainzaak wrote:cacasplat3 wrote:was thinking about this the other day........they dont charge cyclists for passing cars that stopped in traffic.....so why charge motorcyclists? bicycles are considered vehicles, so then cyclists are just as guilty...........of course i dont have the two wrongs make a right argument........i'm thinking that if yur going to enforce that law, do it across the board.......
I think the argument to that would be that one, cyclist aren't allowed to ride on the highway in the first place, but they do it anyone.
Two, they are unlicensed, hence not considered vehicles by law.
Motorbikes are licensed and must ad hear to the rules of the road.
Try riding your motorbike up a on way street nah, see if police eh stop you.
Dude cyclist are allowed to ride on the highway, but only Racing licensed cyclist
they are also required to follow the rules of the road......although its not enforced, bicycles are supposed to follow the flow of traffic i.e. ride on the left of the road and adhere to one ways.......
Always thought they were not allowed.
(seeing that sign on the highway saying " NO mopeds, dogs, bicycles etc allowed on highway reinforced it that thought)
Motorist don't even adhere to the road rules, bicycles will?
The sign says NO mopeds,dogs,bicycles ect.
But there are NO traffic laws for this, its only a sign. The only law for bicyles are that it must have lights at nights.
Ever notice that on early morninings you will see a bunch of racing cyclist training on the highways and the police do nothing about it. Why do u think the police do nothing about it?
....
Captainzaak wrote:zoom rader wrote:Captainzaak wrote:cacasplat3 wrote:zoom rader wrote:Captainzaak wrote:cacasplat3 wrote:was thinking about this the other day........they dont charge cyclists for passing cars that stopped in traffic.....so why charge motorcyclists? bicycles are considered vehicles, so then cyclists are just as guilty...........of course i dont have the two wrongs make a right argument........i'm thinking that if yur going to enforce that law, do it across the board.......
I think the argument to that would be that one, cyclist aren't allowed to ride on the highway in the first place, but they do it anyone.
Two, they are unlicensed, hence not considered vehicles by law.
Motorbikes are licensed and must ad hear to the rules of the road.
Try riding your motorbike up a on way street nah, see if police eh stop you.
Dude cyclist are allowed to ride on the highway, but only Racing licensed cyclist
they are also required to follow the rules of the road......although its not enforced, bicycles are supposed to follow the flow of traffic i.e. ride on the left of the road and adhere to one ways.......
Always thought they were not allowed.
(seeing that sign on the highway saying " NO mopeds, dogs, bicycles etc allowed on highway reinforced it that thought)
Motorist don't even adhere to the road rules, bicycles will?
The sign says NO mopeds,dogs,bicycles ect.
But there are NO traffic laws for this, its only a sign. The only law for bicyles are that it must have lights at nights.
Ever notice that on early morninings you will see a bunch of racing cyclist training on the highways and the police do nothing about it. Why do u think the police do nothing about it?
Cuz is trini police
That'll explain a lot.
zoom rader wrote:Captainzaak wrote:zoom rader wrote:Captainzaak wrote:cacasplat3 wrote:zoom rader wrote:Captainzaak wrote:cacasplat3 wrote:was thinking about this the other day........they dont charge cyclists for passing cars that stopped in traffic.....so why charge motorcyclists? bicycles are considered vehicles, so then cyclists are just as guilty...........of course i dont have the two wrongs make a right argument........i'm thinking that if yur going to enforce that law, do it across the board.......
I think the argument to that would be that one, cyclist aren't allowed to ride on the highway in the first place, but they do it anyone.
Two, they are unlicensed, hence not considered vehicles by law.
Motorbikes are licensed and must ad hear to the rules of the road.
Try riding your motorbike up a on way street nah, see if police eh stop you.
Dude cyclist are allowed to ride on the highway, but only Racing licensed cyclist
they are also required to follow the rules of the road......although its not enforced, bicycles are supposed to follow the flow of traffic i.e. ride on the left of the road and adhere to one ways.......
Always thought they were not allowed.
(seeing that sign on the highway saying " NO mopeds, dogs, bicycles etc allowed on highway reinforced it that thought)
Motorist don't even adhere to the road rules, bicycles will?
The sign says NO mopeds,dogs,bicycles ect.
But there are NO traffic laws for this, its only a sign. The only law for bicyles are that it must have lights at nights.
Ever notice that on early morninings you will see a bunch of racing cyclist training on the highways and the police do nothing about it. Why do u think the police do nothing about it?
Cuz is trini police
That'll explain a lot.
No dude, Is becuase a bunch of local racing cyclist won a court case against the police/state because NO law exist with the use of the highway and cyclist.
cacasplat3 wrote:not sure who saw this in the classifieds but i have seen this bike run and it is in rail car territory
http://forums.trinituner.com/forums/vie ... light=bike
cacasplat3 wrote:^^^i think joel did the install.......he lives about a mile from me. quite knowledgeable when it comes to pros and cons of different bikes......
as for the bike being sold.......he may come with something bigger, but its not easy getting something faster than that busa..........
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests
