Flow
Flow
Flow
TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

<<TriniTuner 2009 F1 Thread>>

Automotive Non-Technical topics... Just anything car related for the gear head in all of us

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

User avatar
JoKeR1980
punchin NOS
Posts: 3903
Joined: March 4th, 2009, 1:05 pm
Location: All over de place

Postby JoKeR1980 » May 10th, 2009, 8:33 am

NOOOOO!!!!

kimi need a bush bath jed

User avatar
Maserati
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6867
Joined: May 26th, 2003, 12:35 am
Location: up d road
Contact:

Postby Maserati » May 10th, 2009, 9:46 am

yea hard luck for kimmi

congrats to Button once again!!

brawn 1 2

Webber 3rd

User avatar
JoKeR1980
punchin NOS
Posts: 3903
Joined: March 4th, 2009, 1:05 pm
Location: All over de place

Postby JoKeR1980 » May 10th, 2009, 9:53 am

i think the whole of scuderia need to go visit the pope for another blessing oui...

User avatar
Alpha_2nr
punchin NOS
Posts: 3924
Joined: August 17th, 2005, 9:12 pm

Postby Alpha_2nr » May 10th, 2009, 10:10 am

And Rubens is probably wondering to himself how the heck did he end up playing second fiddle.........AGAIN. :?


Hard luck for Kimi...he needs a better (more reliable?) car......and the one hit wonder (aka Hammie) just fades into the background.

User avatar
noshownogo
punchin NOS
Posts: 4379
Joined: January 6th, 2004, 11:51 am
Location: heavy petting!
Contact:

Postby noshownogo » May 10th, 2009, 11:21 am

Brawn GP ran a great race, proving that they not only have great cars with superb development, but a great team.

Massa was real unfortunate at the end with the fuel issue and having to give up points to Vettel and Alonso. Ferrari can't seem to find a break.

User avatar
Alpha_2nr
punchin NOS
Posts: 3924
Joined: August 17th, 2005, 9:12 pm

Postby Alpha_2nr » May 10th, 2009, 8:26 pm

^^Fred was vicious on that last turn when passing Massa..... :shock:

Apparently even having the Schumey on the side lines with the crew didn't help Ferrari. It's really a shame though...... :?

User avatar
teems1
punchin NOS
Posts: 3448
Joined: March 15th, 2007, 4:44 pm

Postby teems1 » May 10th, 2009, 8:30 pm

Knight1 wrote:......and the one hit wonder (aka Hammie) just fades into the background.


The MP4-24 is not competitive. Hamilton has been doing better than expected by scoring points so far.

User avatar
Alpha_2nr
punchin NOS
Posts: 3924
Joined: August 17th, 2005, 9:12 pm

Postby Alpha_2nr » May 10th, 2009, 9:10 pm

^^Yeah but he's not consistent.

Compare him to Kimi back when he was in a Mclaren.....(around when Schumey was still driving).......wait.....there is no comparison :lol:

User avatar
MG Man
2NRholic
Posts: 23909
Joined: May 1st, 2003, 1:31 pm
Location: between cinco leg

Postby MG Man » May 11th, 2009, 6:35 am

teems1 wrote:
Knight1 wrote:......and the one hit wonder (aka Hammie) just fades into the background.


The MP4-24 is not competitive. Hamilton has been doing better than expected by scoring points so far.


oh please.............so Mr. Raw Talent needs a competitive car to shine?????

User avatar
dmitc
Chronic TriniTuner
Posts: 623
Joined: December 19th, 2007, 11:02 am
Location: Barataria

Postby dmitc » May 11th, 2009, 9:02 am

good to see the F60 have become more competitive, they have not reached the pace of the top runner but good improvement non the less

User avatar
Alpha_2nr
punchin NOS
Posts: 3924
Joined: August 17th, 2005, 9:12 pm

Postby Alpha_2nr » May 11th, 2009, 10:31 am

oh please.............so Mr. Raw Talent needs a competitive car to shine?????


Careful!!! Doh disrespek Mr. Talent.......ah might have to try ah "Hammie" on yuh (mash ah sudden brakes if yuh tailgating me).



:lol:

User avatar
RASC
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8338
Joined: February 6th, 2004, 11:00 am

Postby RASC » May 11th, 2009, 10:35 am

Guy's this rules change is creating quite a stir for next season.

<a href="http://www.almostdeluxe.com/?p=451">Now Toyota is threatening to withdraw pending the 2010 rule changes...</a> :|

User avatar
JoKeR1980
punchin NOS
Posts: 3903
Joined: March 4th, 2009, 1:05 pm
Location: All over de place

Postby JoKeR1980 » May 11th, 2009, 12:54 pm

Rubens: I won't tolerate team orders
Sunday 10th May 2009

Rubens Barrichello has threatened to quit Formula One if he senses team orders coming into play in his fight for the title with team-mate Jenson Button.

http://www.planetf1.com/story/0,18954,3 ... 71,00.html

User avatar
JoKeR1980
punchin NOS
Posts: 3903
Joined: March 4th, 2009, 1:05 pm
Location: All over de place

Postby JoKeR1980 » May 11th, 2009, 12:59 pm


User avatar
dmitc
Chronic TriniTuner
Posts: 623
Joined: December 19th, 2007, 11:02 am
Location: Barataria

Postby dmitc » May 11th, 2009, 1:44 pm

RASC wrote:Guy's this rules change is creating quite a stir for next season.

<a href="http://www.almostdeluxe.com/?p=451">Now Toyota is threatening to withdraw pending the 2010 rule changes...</a> :|


Red bull and Torro Rosso as well

"If the proposed rules for 2010 stay unchanged, we will not take part in the 2010 Championship," Red Bull owner Dietrich Mateschitz told the Salzburger Nachrichten newspaper.


http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12433_5312950,00.html

User avatar
Freelander
3NE2NR is my LIFE
Posts: 825
Joined: October 23rd, 2003, 1:15 pm
Location: toronto,canada keeping it chill
Contact:

Postby Freelander » May 11th, 2009, 2:58 pm

JoKeR1980 wrote:Rubens: I won't tolerate team orders
Sunday 10th May 2009

Rubens Barrichello has threatened to quit Formula One if he senses team orders coming into play in his fight for the title with team-mate Jenson Button.

http://www.planetf1.com/story/0,18954,3 ... 71,00.html


that article is crap!

the decision to switch strategies was made by button's race engineer. its ruben's race engineer's own fault for not updating strategies as the rqace progressed.

i mean it sucks for rubens always being second, but that is how all sports are played.

User avatar
djaggs
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1431
Joined: May 23rd, 2006, 11:47 pm
Contact:

Barcelona F1

Postby djaggs » May 11th, 2009, 3:24 pm

I feel sorry for Rubens, he was driving really well. Im kinda hoping he cud steal the championship before he retires, he deserves it, but Button is on the B utton this year.

Qualifying was the best i've seen in a long time, exciting stuff.

I really thought Brawn was favouring Button over Ruben but apparently not, see below.

F1: Analysis - Tires Cost Barrichello VictoryWritten by: Adam Cooper Barcelona (ESP)Page 1 2Spanish Grand Prix Photo Gallery HERE

Barrichello (L) once again had to cede the limelight to Button (Getty) » More PhotosThe Spanish GP continued its habit of rewarding the pole man as for the ninth year running the guy who started at the front won the race. But it wasn’t quite as easy as that, as for much of the afternoon it was Rubens Barrichello and not Jenson Button who held the advantage.

In the end their fortunes were reversed, and that inevitably has created something of a controversy as the Brawn team appeared to favour the championship leader, at the expense of poor old Rubens. But appearances can be deceptive, and the reality seems to be that that wasn’t the case.

Rubens had been quicker than Jenson for most of the weekend, and it was really only when it mattered in final qualifying that Button’s last gasp effort put him in front. From third on the grid Rubens did a great job to slice past not only Sebastian Vettel but also Jenson, by towing up behind on the run to Turn One and then pulling out and passing him round the outside. It was great stuff, and Rubens rightly surmised that his team mate would have to give best.

The safety car period slowed things down for a bit, but Rubens looked pretty comfortable out front in that first stint. There’s was some interest dialogue on the team radio as Jenson urged his team mate to get a move on, as if Barrichello could actually hear him. The only two-way conversations between team mates that I’ve ever come across were in that awful Sylvester Stallone movie, Driven...

Anyway, things got interesting at the first stops. As expected Jenson came in a lap earlier than his team mate, but it was clear from the nozzle times that the Englishman took on a significantly longer load. And that could only mean that while he was on a more traditional two-stop, Rubens was going for three stops.
At the time it looked like Rubens had been switched, but the real story is that both drivers were apparently originally intended to go for three stops, and while Rubens stuck to that, it was Jenson who was switched – in essence because there was a fear that he’d get stuck in traffic, be unable to properly take advantageof his light load, and risk being passed by Massa and Vettel.

Indeed the team still felt that three was the way to go and, if everything went to plan, Rubens would retain his advantage for the rest of the race. Initially it looked like that would be the case, as in his second stint he opened up a reasonable gap. But after his stop on his third set of tyres he wasn’t very happy, and didn’t make the progress that he needed to. And that translated into Jenson getting ahead when both men had completed their final stops.

The conspiracy theorists suggest that Rubens was put on an unfavourable strategy in order to slow him down and allow Jenson through, but it was rather a convoluted way of doing it, and the official Brawn line does make sense.

Rubens himself was a little shell shocked afterwards. I was standing alongside SPEED’s Peter Windsor when Rubens gave us an astonishing quote when asked to compare the situation with the one he left at Ferrari: ‘If I ever think that Ross has done something to favour Jenson, I will put my boots up and call it a day. I won’t go into that direction. It’s so much a softer atmosphere, and it was Ross that called me to be driving for him. He’s a guy that I believe in very much, and a guy that I think likes me. So I cannot believe in that. The day he tells me he gave a favour to Jenson is the day that... He won’t see me any more in this, because I don’t need that, I’m much bigger than that.’

Powerful stuff! But after he returned to the team, spoke to Brawn, looked at the numbers and heard the full story for himself, he accepted that fortune hadn’t favoured him. What did annoy him was that he hadn’t been told in advance of his own stop that Jenson’s strategy had changed, and he could not react. Meanwhile team insiders pointed to his disappointing third stint as evidence that he hadn’t done as good a job as Jenson.

You had to feel sorry for the guy, because he’s done a pretty good job for most of the year, and seems to have been getting as much bad luck land come his way as Jenson has had good luck. But for someone in his 275th start he’s still pretty hungry, and that elusive win can’t be far away.

User avatar
dmitc
Chronic TriniTuner
Posts: 623
Joined: December 19th, 2007, 11:02 am
Location: Barataria

Postby dmitc » May 11th, 2009, 8:09 pm

Freelander wrote:
JoKeR1980 wrote:Rubens: I won't tolerate team orders
Sunday 10th May 2009

Rubens Barrichello has threatened to quit Formula One if he senses team orders coming into play in his fight for the title with team-mate Jenson Button.

http://www.planetf1.com/story/0,18954,3 ... 71,00.html


that article is crap!

the decision to switch strategies was made by button's race engineer. its ruben's race engineer's own fault for not updating strategies as the rqace progressed.

i mean it sucks for rubens always being second, but that is how all sports are played.


oh come on, do you people really believe Brawn GP went from a 3 stop strategy to a 2 stop. that is just what they saying to make it sound like team order were not involved.
Barrichello was upset not because Button went from 3 to 2 but because he went from 2 to 3. Really why would they even contemplate a 3 stop strategy to begin with especially when they had comparable fuel loads with the other top runners and they were 1 and 3

User avatar
noshownogo
punchin NOS
Posts: 4379
Joined: January 6th, 2004, 11:51 am
Location: heavy petting!
Contact:

Postby noshownogo » May 12th, 2009, 12:02 pm

Ferrari just confirmed that they will also pull out of F1 at the end of the season pending the FIA's decision on the next season's rules and regulation changes proposed.

User avatar
Maserati
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6867
Joined: May 26th, 2003, 12:35 am
Location: up d road
Contact:

Postby Maserati » May 12th, 2009, 12:06 pm

somehow I can see the FIA backing down

User avatar
noshownogo
punchin NOS
Posts: 4379
Joined: January 6th, 2004, 11:51 am
Location: heavy petting!
Contact:

Postby noshownogo » May 12th, 2009, 12:40 pm

its a sticky situation tho, because on the one hand the main issue for most teams is the financial cap proposed which would limit the teams to something like 40million euro on car development. On the other hand it has become an incentive for other teams to enter F1 which would be a welcome to fans but at the risk of undermining their favourite current F1 teams.

User avatar
Maserati
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6867
Joined: May 26th, 2003, 12:35 am
Location: up d road
Contact:

Postby Maserati » May 12th, 2009, 1:33 pm

this is how the 2010 rules are looking

Refueling banned
First of all, the council has confirmed that refueling will be banned as of 2010. There have been talks about this change for a while, mostly because it will have a considerable impact for the car's designs. At some circuits fuel consumption is currently as high as 3l per lap, requiring next year's cars to have fuel tanks of approximately 180l, maybe even more. To put this in perspective, most teams currently have tanks of about 90l. The change will remove the need to transport the 20 heavy refuelling rigs to each race venue, while on the sportive side we may again see drivers having to save fuel at some point during the race. It may even come to situations as in the late 80's where drivers just ran out of fuel towards the end of a race.

Increased weight limit
Due to the pressure of BMW Sauber who want to reduce the disadvantage heavier drivers have now, the minimum weight has been increased from 605kg to 620kg.

Safety measures for the front wing
In the margin of changes, the new rules also stipulate an extended area where bodywork components must have a minimum radius to prevent damage to an opponent's tyre in case of a collision:

3.4.2 In order to prevent tyre damage to other cars, the top, forward and outer edges of the lateral extremities of any bodywork more than 450mm ahead of the front wheel centre line and more than 750mm from the car centre line must be at least 10mm thick with a radius of at least 5mm.



More strict KERS regulations
As of 2010, the KERS may not be activated when a car is travelling at more than 300km/h. This change will effectively eliminate the possibility to use KERS for additional top speed but instead allow its use to more quickly attain than top speed. In addition to that, homologated sensors on the system will be required. The position of the KERS storage device - whether it is a flywheel or a battery pack - will have to be located ahead of the front of the engine and behind the driver. It is believed that all current KERS cars nearly comply to this regulation already.

5.2.5 All KERS energy storage devices must be situated between the front face of the engine and the driver's back when viewed in lateral projection. When establishing the front face of the engine, no parts of the fuel, oil, water or electrical systems will be considered. 5.2.6 Cars must be fitted with homologated sensors which provide all necessary signals to the SDR in order to verify the requirements above are being respected.



Budget capped regulation set

With the start of 2010, an additional regulation formula will be introduced that will put teams on a budget limit of £45 million. In exchange these will receive more technical freedom.

More power from the engine
One of these particularities is the removal of the 18000rpm limit. Whether this will prove interesting is something else, as the teams will be using the same standardized engines as all other competitors. Because these have been designed to last long enough to manage a full season with 8 engines, reliability may be severely compromised if teams choose to run them at higher speeds. Apart from this worry, increased speed will also come with increased fuel consumption. The teams willing to run their engines at higher rpm consistently will have to build larger fuel tanks and be slower at the beginning of the race due to their higher fuel ballast.

Movable aerodynamics
Budget controlled teams will be allowed to have their front wing adjusted by 10°, a surplus of 4° over the teams that choose to go with the conventional rule set. They will also be allowed to adjust the front wing's incidence any time they find it appropriate - and not limited to twice a lap. The rear wing will also be adjustable and can greatly help to boost a car on high speed sections of a circuit.

3.18.2 The incidence of the upper section described in Article 3.10.2 (if two sections are used) may be varied whilst the car is in motion, provided any such change maintains compliance with all of the bodywork dimensional regulations. Alteration of the incidence of this section may only be commanded by direct driver input and controlled using the control electronics specified in Article 8.2. This Article applies only to Cost-Regulated Teams.



Doubled KERS power
Perhaps the most interesting benefit for these teams will be the double power allowed from their KERS devices. The cars will be allowed to release twice the energy - in and out - with KERS. Hence, with the same KERS system, they can use the additional 60hp for up to 12s per lap. Or, alternatively, the system can be adapted to have 120hp available during 6s.

5.2.3 The maximum power, in or out, of any KERS must not exceed 60kW. Energy released from the KERS may not exceed 400kJ in any one lap. Measurements will be taken at the connection to the drivetrain. For Cost-Regulated Teams only the following will apply :
- the power in is unrestricted ;
- the power out is limited to 120kW ;
- the energy released per lap is limited to 800kJ ;
- measurements will be taken at any FIA approved point in the drivetrain.



Four wheel drive
On top of that, cost regulated teams will be allowed four wheel drive. For those teams, article 9.1 of the technical regulations that states "No transmission system may permit more than two wheels to be driven." has been scrapped from the rulebook. While there is an extensive range of possibilities to exploit this change, it is most likely that teams will add a motor-generator for their KERS systems to the front wheels, allowing to charge the KERS device with brake energy from the front wheels too, whereas this is currently not allowed. As a direct consequence, the front wheels are also allowed to be powered by KERS.

Complete testing freedom
Currently teams are not allowed any in-season testing. However, it will be up to the budget-limited teams when they test in 2010, as long as they don't exceed their limited yearly budget.

Full scale wind tunnel testing
The cost-reducing regulation that allows teams only to run 50% scale models in their wind tunnels will be removed for teams complying with the budget limitation.

User avatar
dmitc
Chronic TriniTuner
Posts: 623
Joined: December 19th, 2007, 11:02 am
Location: Barataria

Postby dmitc » May 12th, 2009, 2:25 pm


User avatar
dmitc
Chronic TriniTuner
Posts: 623
Joined: December 19th, 2007, 11:02 am
Location: Barataria

Postby dmitc » May 12th, 2009, 2:43 pm

my question is why is it that FIA keep insisting on bringing down cost but they constantly change the rules each year forcing teams to spend countless millions on R&D not to mention design and reliability.

I'm glad Ferrari is leaving if there is no change in there ridiculous rules that way i would not be tempted to watch.

User avatar
Alpha_2nr
punchin NOS
Posts: 3924
Joined: August 17th, 2005, 9:12 pm

Postby Alpha_2nr » May 12th, 2009, 3:11 pm

More strict KERS regulations
As of 2010, the KERS may not be activated when a car is travelling at more than 300km/h. This change will effectively eliminate the possibility to use KERS for additional top speed but instead allow its use to more quickly attain than top speed.


Absolute BS. I mean, those cars accelerate to 200+ kph in the blink of an eye.......the advantage to use KERS would have been at higher speeds on a straight to pass someone who may have a little edge on you on the top end IMHO.

I thought the WANTED to encourage passing......


my question is why is it that FIA keep insisting on bringing down cost but they constantly change the rules each year forcing teams to spend countless millions on R&D not to mention design and reliability.


X23456!!!! Is it a concerted effort to give the "more" affluent teams a harder time? If they really wanted more new teams to enter F1...they should have made some minimal changes, and put the cap on development after that.......whether you like it or not, the more experienced teams will always have an advantage...no matter how much the FIA tries to limit what they can do with the car for the new season......


Refueling banned
First of all, the council has confirmed that refueling will be banned as of 2010. There have been talks about this change for a while, mostly because it will have a considerable impact for the car's designs.


This changes the dynamics of the race entirely.......the whole idea of pitstop strategy vs. car weight will be thrown out the window..........

User avatar
teems1
punchin NOS
Posts: 3448
Joined: March 15th, 2007, 4:44 pm

Postby teems1 » May 12th, 2009, 4:40 pm

Max and Bernie are right to want to lower the cost of F1.

Too much money was being spent on F1 especially in this economic climate.

His way of doing it was wrong tho. He can't expect Ferrari/Toyota to go from 400m budget one year to approx 55m the next. Its just impossible.

He should have staggered the amount instead of setting it so low.

User avatar
dmitc
Chronic TriniTuner
Posts: 623
Joined: December 19th, 2007, 11:02 am
Location: Barataria

Postby dmitc » May 12th, 2009, 4:42 pm

Knight1 wrote:
Refueling banned
First of all, the council has confirmed that refueling will be banned as of 2010. There have been talks about this change for a while, mostly because it will have a considerable impact for the car's designs.


This changes the dynamics of the race entirely.......the whole idea of pitstop strategy vs. car weight will be thrown out the window..........

i still trying to figure out how exactly qualifying would be, is it that they going to allow teams to run whatever fuel level in qualifying and then they fill up for the race or is it that you have to run race fuel during qualifying?

User avatar
Maserati
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6867
Joined: May 26th, 2003, 12:35 am
Location: up d road
Contact:

Postby Maserati » May 13th, 2009, 10:57 am

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/motorsp ... 048112.stm


Renault join F1 pull-out threat

Renault are the latest high-profile team threatening to quit Formula 1 unless proposals to adopt a £40m budget cap in 2010 are shelved.

On Tuesday, Ferrari joined Toyota and Red Bull in declaring their intention to pull out of F1 because of the plans.

And Renault boss Flavio Briatore has adopted a similar stance.

"If the decisions announced by the FIA are not revised, we have no choice but to withdraw from the world championship at the end of 2009," he said.

User avatar
noshownogo
punchin NOS
Posts: 4379
Joined: January 6th, 2004, 11:51 am
Location: heavy petting!
Contact:

Postby noshownogo » May 13th, 2009, 12:38 pm

well it looks as though either the FIA amend their rule changes for 2010 or face shutting down F1 for the season.

A meeting is scheduled to happen Friday morning to resolve these issues between the teams and the FIA.
This after the FIA president called their bluff stating "Ferrari are not stupid," "They don't want to leave Formula 1 and we don't want to lose them, so we'll get to grips with it."

User avatar
dmitc
Chronic TriniTuner
Posts: 623
Joined: December 19th, 2007, 11:02 am
Location: Barataria

Postby dmitc » May 13th, 2009, 12:50 pm

noshownogo wrote:well it looks as though either the FIA amend their rule changes for 2010 or face shutting down F1 for the season.

A meeting is scheduled to happen Friday morning to resolve these issues between the teams and the FIA.
This after the FIA president called their bluff stating "Ferrari are not stupid," "They don't want to leave Formula 1 and we don't want to lose them, so we'll get to grips with it."


it's one thing if a team principal says it but when it comes from the board of directors of the parent company in a statement which includes their first quarter result trust me it's no bluff

Advertisement

Return to “The Car Park”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests