Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
fiveforward wrote:Noted SR and Duane, those answers just raise more questions but say wah. The money that himself is going to spend on himself in order to raise money for himself is best himself just donate the money directly and done. Why spend money on an event when based on many factors analyses in a cost/ benefit analysis it IS going to yield a NET LOSS.
These men never did business or what, no wait - based on their business success history their track records speak glaringly.
well the alternative is what? no track?fiveforward wrote:Noted SR and Duane, those answers just raise more questions but say wah. The money that himself is going to spend on himself in order to raise money for himself is best himself just donate the money directly and done. Why spend money on an event when based on many factors analyses in a cost/ benefit analysis it IS going to yield a NET LOSS.
These men never did business or what, no wait - based on their business success history their track records speak glaringly.
I'm sure the financial report will be available for members, but the meeting on Wednesday night was actually open to anyone interested in attending.fiveforward wrote:SR, you're right, tunnel vision again. So in the quest for enlightenment and to widen my knowledge base; in the meeting did TTASA do any kind of breakdown as to EXACTLY how much money was made and is owed going into and coming out of the CMRC event or were you like many just told a general statement to represent a re occurring state of affairs just of the top of the dome.
I mean fiscal prudence and accountability is very important unno.
Shoot me a figure nah.
I don't think everything is hinging on that one event.pete wrote:If it's to make $100k by the end of the month "personally" I'd rather they ask for donations, maybe give a "social membership" or something and allow people to have reduced entrance fees for events later in the year. Instead of trying to stage an event in the middle of the rainy season, competing with another organisation AND cricket to "maybe" make the money. If it gets rained out then we're going to lose wallerfield AGAIN? Nah man that's not a good plan.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote: the other issue is that TTASA needs to show both the Ministry of Sport and Eteck that the facility is being used all the time.
Its usually a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation - people want racing events, people don't want racing events on days they are busy.
I can PM you the President and VP phone numbers and email addresses so you can tell them exactly what they need to dofiveforward wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote: the other issue is that TTASA needs to show both the Ministry of Sport and Eteck that the facility is being used all the time.
Its usually a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation - people want racing events, people don't want racing events on days they are busy.
If TTASA wants to show activity Track weekends will show more interest than them trying to throw a drags and people want MORE than just a racing event they want entertainment, quality and value. TTASA needs to get its ACT together, learn from the past and adapt. This is not the 90's/ 80's/ 70's times are different.
TTASA needs to make some choices and hard decisions in order to get it right.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:I can PM you the President and VP phone numbers and email addresses so you can tell them exactly what they need to do
or you can post it here, they are reading it anyway.
Good ideas Pete. I think the thinking is that a drag event will bring in more cash, both from entry fees and spectators than a driving school or track day would. But agreed, if it rains then it could make things worse.pete wrote:CARS does navigational rallies to help cover the cost of using ARC. I don't see anything wrong with hosting events that generate income to cover the cost of day to day operation. I just think it's a bit risky trying to do that with a drag racing event right now.
Also, ARA gave up their last day so their competitors could compete/spectate at the CMRC it's kind of a big F-U to now come and throw a drag event on the next day of their competition.
Also, if they want to show they're doing something for the sport they could hold a driving school next week, the following week or whenever and that would show that they're actually doing something for the sport outside of throwing a drag event to make money.
Let's see how this goes. Prediction based on common sense - expenses will be more than income based on observation of many patters. But they are welcome to try - God Bless their heart.Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:I think the thinking is that a drag event will bring in more cash
Let's see how this works out in the LONG TERM. And you are right the only way to effect change in from the inside; you can't do anything from the outside looking in.Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:At the end of the day, beat up how much you like, they have done what they have done despite the naysayers.
SR wrote:Truth to what exactly?? Narend was also at the meeting wed night. I am sure he can also confirm what was stated.
If TTASA wants to show activity Track weekends will show more interest than them trying to throw a drags and people want MORE than just a racing event they want entertainment, quality and value. TTASA needs to get its ACT together, learn from the past and adapt. This is not the 90's/ 80's/ 70's times are different.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:I must admit though that it is overly coincidental that these events get dropped on the same day as AutoSport events.
eh?BANzai Rastafarai wrote:SR wrote:Truth to what exactly?? Narend was also at the meeting wed night. I am sure he can also confirm what was stated.
this.If TTASA wants to show activity Track weekends will show more interest than them trying to throw a drags and people want MORE than just a racing event they want entertainment, quality and value. TTASA needs to get its ACT together, learn from the past and adapt. This is not the 90's/ 80's/ 70's times are different.
Its says ALOT when you/Duane/Narend have to bring updates on TTASA meetings that clearly affect all interested parties instead of TTASA themselves.
To somone looking on, its almost like TTASA withholding something from the public. Again i was not there nor privy.. but im sure men like LINK and/or an official from TTASA can draft something and have Duane put it as a sticky.
Jus sayn
2015 > 1995AutoSport wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:I must admit though that it is overly coincidental that these events get dropped on the same day as AutoSport events.
Race dates set since the end of 2013 and TTASA selects a CMRC date bang on the same date as AutoSport in July 2014 Sun27 D&W# 6
Come 2015, dates again selected at the end of 2014 and passed on to TTASA, history again repeating itself…CMRC on 21st June, so AutoSport cancelled their Event… and AutoSport did come and assist at the TTASA CMRC Event! Sun 21 June D&W# 4
AutoSport next D&W Event Sun 26 July D&W# 4
And what next do we see… a TTASA endorsed Drag Event on 26th July.
How lucky can we be!
SR wrote:And as far as i can tell those activities are being worked on from ttasa's end for a long term solution. Has any of the other bodies approac ttasa as yet for promoting thier own event? I am sure if they did they can state what was the response. If speed promotions is capable of pulling off an event in 2 weeks then its a plus for ttasa. I am sure nobody knows exactly how much money went out of peoples pockets to get the track and where it is now over the last year from the first event. Frankie was soley responsible (we are told) for getting the track paved. If this is the case then who else has made similar contributions for the development of wallerfield. While we all kno the past and anyone who has read my posts in the past know where i stand on those issues if we dont actually get involved now then you wont know what is really going on. Its easy for some to hide behind the keyboard because they prefer to do a lot of talking. As for link.... he an his company were one of the first to make a pledge towards the bill.
correct. next year the lease is $200,000 to be paid to Eteck to use Wallerfield.Garrett Inside wrote:SR wrote:And as far as i can tell those activities are being worked on from ttasa's end for a long term solution. Has any of the other bodies approac ttasa as yet for promoting thier own event? I am sure if they did they can state what was the response. If speed promotions is capable of pulling off an event in 2 weeks then its a plus for ttasa. I am sure nobody knows exactly how much money went out of peoples pockets to get the track and where it is now over the last year from the first event. Frankie was soley responsible (we are told) for getting the track paved. If this is the case then who else has made similar contributions for the development of wallerfield. While we all kno the past and anyone who has read my posts in the past know where i stand on those issues if we dont actually get involved now then you wont know what is really going on. Its easy for some to hide behind the keyboard because they prefer to do a lot of talking. As for link.... he an his company were one of the first to make a pledge towards the bill.
D
They didn't just pledge....they gave the management team a $3000.00 cheque.
Many others did too, autonation pledged $5000.00 among others.
The next year rent is more btw, it's what eteck ask of ttasa and payment for this year is due immediately after the cmrc event. Frankie is really trying to get the funds from d drags to hopefully pay the balance.
If I remember correctly the pledges in total that night was about 22k, everybody put aside their differences and showed solidarity to at least meet this 100k bill, for the continuation of wallerfield.
definitely not an ambassador - just calling as I see it.BANzai Rastafarai wrote:If you and SR are ambassadors, then say so.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests