Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
dragzster wrote:dude no offense but u seriously sound like a troll and thank goodness we're not stupid little fools to start a thread war but it sounds u really want to dwell in it though. a rotary would never last on your hands as a daily driver and there are guys with there 3rd gens who make high speeds with their stock engines on some 1st world freeways? getting info is sure one helluva ting. Peace.
dragzster wrote:^^^true, the rotary seals of yesteryears are not like the newer ones these days. The new ones are made to take the wear and tear and last much longer. Gas consumption I agree is a lot and rivals that of many high cc V6 engines so I wouldn't debate that and ofcourse the rotary after a couple thousand miles I believe needs to be topped up with a quart of oil so in that respect it requires more effort and work than say an equally powered turbocharged 4-cylinder or NA V6. Sorry for the mix up otherwise.
MaelstroM wrote:Mr Go Slow.
I can understand your point about reliability but not for the reason u probably have in mind.
Most cars in Trinidad are not well tuned and I have said before and I'll say again because I still think that it remains very true that a well tuned rotary will last with any well tuned piston engine, but an un-tuned one will go in a second...literally....which is prob why all these rumours started in the first place.
And well I dont have a 3rd gen but I think the issue here is the engine which I do have in my 1st gen and I dynoed at 351 rwhp@14psi on pump gas which is what I run everyday.I pull 7500 on the road and 8600 in drags. Ask Audie (dyno guy) for confirmation. I do have a printout home of it.
I built my engine in july 2003 and I never had to do ANYTHING to it since then...honestly.
AFR is 10.8 (which is generally considered conservative)
My tuner (also my cousin) Matt Leicher (www.hitman.hm) tunes a lot of cars making that power. Check his site for confirmation.
Most of his tuned cars are street cars as well.
Rotaries suck at gas consumption and oil consumption hence maintenance is high and necessary....these are not reliability issues tho and my guess is that the guy (being a drag-racer) doesnt care too highly for mpg figures.
CA19,
The same procedure can be done for a 13B s6 engine.
I run stock (ie unported engine) with stock seals(ie OEM Mazda) at present and as said before I never had to change out anything. This is basically the same as buying a bamboo engine. The ONLY reason I didnt go that way is that I dont like the cat-in-bag scene where u dont know what the hell you getting for your money, which holds true for ANY engine.
Anyways, having said alllll this, to each his own and if the guy has had good experiences with sr20 as well as the capability to tune them (which he obviously has), then who is to blame him.
Certainly not I, he would smoke me on the strip.
the swap is really well done actually..not bad...but i dont understand why to an SR20 ...that doesnt make much sense..as Maelstrom said...maybe to a 2JZ or RB26 wud be understandable....the car looks great imo...at least he kept it JDm an didnt throw in a big block inside there...that wud really have made me barf all over this thread
when they do swaps its like buying aloo pie wit nothing but butter and cheese in it. yuh could eat it and it might goh dong good with lime peppa sauce but its not right. ya digg?
RS200 wrote:when they do swaps its like buying aloo pie wit nothing but butter and cheese in it. yuh could eat it and it might goh dong good with lime peppa sauce but its not right. ya digg?
we clearly said in the thread its not a piston vs rotary or why he did the swap kinda thread, its about a cool car
why cant you just appreciate it for what it is???
i love rotaries and i love turbo nissans, toyotas, mitsubishi's, na honda's anything....
all this fanboy crap.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests