Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
agent007 wrote:Hi Chyna,
Welcome to the forums and to this thread. You are on the right path to buying something descent. A non impulse purchase where one would have put some thought into it, is usually a good purchase and less likely to have buyer remorse.
That said, let's analyze your requirements in summary:
Crossover/SUV or sedan
Family of 4, used up to 7 days a week
$230-$300k
6-7 airbags + all safety features + isofix
Push start
Rear AC vents
Front and rear camera
Awd
1+ USB ports
Based on the above, you would not be able to check all those boxes for that price range.
The price range limits you to:
Toyota Rush
Honda HRV
Nissan Qashqai
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Mitsubishi ASX
Mazda CX-3
Suzuki Vitara
Suzuki SX4 S-Cross
Suzuki Ignis
Subaru XV
Hyundai i20 Activ
Hyundai Venue
Hyundai Creta
Hyundai Tucson
Kia Seltos
Kia Niro
Kia Sportage
Chevrolet Trax
Chevrolet Equinox
Ford EcoSport
AWD models are CX-3, Vitara and XV. To get that awd, you would need to go to the highest spec CX-3 at SS and the AllGrip model of the Vitara. The XV has it standard.
The only ones on that list with 7 airbags is the Vitara GLX and above and any model of the XV.
All the higher trimmed versions of the above vehicles have the proximity key/keyless entry and push button start system. Some of those vehicles have them standard.
In terms of rear AC vents, then your options are Seltos, Sportage, Tucson and Equinox.
None of the above options have 360 camera within that price range.
And for USB ports, most should have at least 1 on the dash, 1 in the center console and maybe 1 for the rear seat passengers but the latter is a stretch. You would need to check them out individually to confirm.
Then we have the issue with airbags. Unfortunately, some still start with just 2 airbags and as you climb in the model range, then you get 6 etc.
So stuff like the Qashqai and Seltos are eliminated with just 2. I know there is a Hyundai model in that list with only 2 but I cant recall which one exactly.
2 special mentions are the most fully equipped Vitara GLX+ AllGrip for $253k. It has the 7 airbags, the safety kit, the awd etc.
The Subaru XV 1.6i-S Eyesight is $299k and the I-S non Eyesight is $269k. It has the best ground clearance, standard 7 airbags and awd, rear camera routed on a large 8" touch screen. The Eyesight package gives you forward collision mitigation and reverse auto braking etc etc.
Or if you can minus the awd and crash Mitigation then I hate to admit this because I personally dislike the Kia Sportage but said Sportage in fully loaded 1.6 GDi guise will give you a good package for $268k.
Good luck.
Pirate wrote:The Subaru XV sounds good for your purposes.
The basic model for around $229K has all the features with the exception of Push Start which is not really much of a feature and you don't have to worry about "losing your keys while driving" as it will be in the proper location, in the ignition.![]()
It has 3 USBs with one in the rear as well so handy for back seat usage. As a plus it has Apple Car Play and Android Auto built in.
It starts at the lower end of your budget (big plus) and also with the Covid 19 outbreak you can negotiate the hell out of the price. At least a 15% down payment will help your case a lot.
Brochure:
https://ss-usa.s3.amazonaws.com/c/30847 ... u%20XV.pdf
Safety Awards:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterlyon/ ... d752df3d32
agent007 wrote:For me the NHR wins over the K2700 and H100 because it has a slightly better payload capacity, a 2.8 engine and is $155k. The Kia is a 2.7 at $154k and the H100 is a 2.6 at $145k (Providing these prices are current).
The reputation of the NHR and resale attached to it vs the 2 korean cousins alone is what wins for me. Also, no commercial korean diesel engine could come close to diesel expert isuzu.
supercharged turbo wrote:Which would be a better option between the NHR and a new model 2 door dmax?I saw you posted that it doesn't come with factory A/C and although that 10k-12k mightn't be extreme,a simple feature like power windows made me lean more towards the H100 rather than K2700.I'm planning to start construction of my home in the coming months,so that will be the main purpose of the vehicle and it will remain for a few years well.agent007 wrote:For me the NHR wins over the K2700 and H100 because it has a slightly better payload capacity, a 2.8 engine and is $155k. The Kia is a 2.7 at $154k and the H100 is a 2.6 at $145k (Providing these prices are current).
The reputation of the NHR and resale attached to it vs the 2 korean cousins alone is what wins for me. Also, no commercial korean diesel engine could come close to diesel expert isuzu.
supercharged turbo wrote:Looks like a ranger
SLVR1 wrote:Agent007, what are your thoughts on the CX3 vs the HRV? Anyone else feel free to join in.
Pirate wrote:SLVR1 wrote:Agent007, what are your thoughts on the CX3 vs the HRV? Anyone else feel free to join in.
If you are looking at those, you should also consider the Subaru XV. It should be slightly roomier as well as the wheelbase, length and width is bigger than the HRV and CX3.
One fun fact, only the XV has a double wishbone suspension setup.
As a plus you don't have to deal with SS, however not sure about ANSA.
![]()
Best bet is to take a test drive of all 3 before buying.
mitch1980 wrote:Pirate wrote:SLVR1 wrote:Agent007, what are your thoughts on the CX3 vs the HRV? Anyone else feel free to join in.
If you are looking at those, you should also consider the Subaru XV. It should be slightly roomier as well as the wheelbase, length and width is bigger than the HRV and CX3.
One fun fact, only the XV has a double wishbone suspension setup.
As a plus you don't have to deal with SS, however not sure about ANSA.
![]()
Best bet is to take a test drive of all 3 before buying.
Subaru XV is sold by Massy Motors
Honda sold by ANSA Auto.
Such a shame that the SS reputation putting off persons from checking out vehicles like the CX3 or even the upcoming CX30 which seems to be a superior option to the XV or Vezel/HRV.Pirate wrote:mitch1980 wrote:Pirate wrote:SLVR1 wrote:Agent007, what are your thoughts on the CX3 vs the HRV? Anyone else feel free to join in.
If you are looking at those, you should also consider the Subaru XV. It should be slightly roomier as well as the wheelbase, length and width is bigger than the HRV and CX3.
One fun fact, only the XV has a double wishbone suspension setup.
As a plus you don't have to deal with SS, however not sure about ANSA.
![]()
Best bet is to take a test drive of all 3 before buying.
Subaru XV is sold by Massy Motors
Honda sold by ANSA Auto.
Meant that if you don't buy the CX3 you don't have to deal with SS.
With ANSA i never got any really bad feedback, more middle of the pack.
Assumed everyone knew Massy sold the Subaru...
wing wrote:Such a shame that the SS reputation putting off persons from checking out vehicles like the CX3 or even the upcoming CX30 which seems to be a superior option to the XV or Vezel/HRV.Pirate wrote:mitch1980 wrote:Pirate wrote:SLVR1 wrote:Agent007, what are your thoughts on the CX3 vs the HRV? Anyone else feel free to join in.
If you are looking at those, you should also consider the Subaru XV. It should be slightly roomier as well as the wheelbase, length and width is bigger than the HRV and CX3.
One fun fact, only the XV has a double wishbone suspension setup.
As a plus you don't have to deal with SS, however not sure about ANSA.
![]()
Best bet is to take a test drive of all 3 before buying.
Subaru XV is sold by Massy Motors
Honda sold by ANSA Auto.
Meant that if you don't buy the CX3 you don't have to deal with SS.
With ANSA i never got any really bad feedback, more middle of the pack.
Assumed everyone knew Massy sold the Subaru...
That's a tough one. What we need to find out is if both SS and Classic Motors currently stock those 2 models and if they do, what do they have available. At one point in time, you could have gotten a CX3 2.0 awd for around $300k. There's not much on the road but I recall seeing one. They handle nicely and the performance is tops for the class (powerful 2.0 plus light weight body).SLVR1 wrote:Agent007, what are your thoughts on the CX3 vs the HRV? Anyone else feel free to join in.
agent007 wrote:That's a tough one. What we need to find out is if both SS and Classic Motors currently stock those 2 models and if they do, what do they have available. At one point in time, you could have gotten a CX3 2.0 awd for around $300k. There's not much on the road but I recall seeing one. They handle nicely and the performance is tops for the class (powerful 2.0 plus light weight body).SLVR1 wrote:Agent007, what are your thoughts on the CX3 vs the HRV? Anyone else feel free to join in.
The HRV has a R18 engine and 5AT transmission that dates back to the 8th gen FA2 Civic launched back in 2005. Though performance is still descent, it IMO will always be 2nd to a CX3.
I saw some comments on the Subaru XV and may I add that it should not be ruled out. While I agree Massy is not the best dealership, I'll take them over SS any day. The immediate downfall of the XV is its performance due to its weight and having a 1.6 engine. I found that despite the CVT, the immediate throttle response seems to be very sharp. That acceleration curve flattens out by the time you hit 100 because let's just face it, powering 2 axles on a permanent awd system will suck power.
That said, it does have its advantages. Firstly, NO OTHER small crossover comes close to the XV in offroad capability. The permanent symmetrical awd system and class leading 8.7inches or 220mm ground clearance are reassuring. I'm not saying you're ready to slay a Jeep Wrangler or a Toyota Hilux off the beaten path, but what I'm saying is, go through some dirt roads and some steepish slippery inclines and that little XV will embarrass crossovers costing more and can surprise you.
I am new to the brand. I've always been a fan of Mazda, Toyota, Honda and Nissan etc but our newest ride is a Subaru and I can tell you, the longitudinal engine layout, the boxer 4 that is so smooth, its inherent design negates the use of dual counter rotating balance shafts to reduce NVH levels. The safety cage alone of that new Subaru Global Platform sharpens handling and increases torsional rigidity by a considerable margin over the previous gen XV. I am willing to bet that the chassis strength of said previous XV is superior to current crossover offerings.
Standard 17" alloys, all wheel disc brakes, 7 airbags and a 6.5" touch screen display with smart phone interface is hard to pass up for the entry model. You would see in pg. 1 that the XV starts at 229k and can climb in the high 300s for the 2.0 i-S Eyesight package. Having crash mitigation and other accident avoidance features makes it even more desirable. If the 2.0 is too much of a stretch then it's available in 1.6 i-S Eyesight as well.
Amongst the small mainstream crossover SUVs available locally, only the Qashqai, CX3, Vitara and XV are available with awd. I'm also willing to bet, those other contenders cannot match the overal features, safety and capability of the Subaru. I must address a major deterrent about boxer engines. Spark plugs can be a pain to change where you may have to remove say the battery or a portion of the intake manifold to reach said plugs but the good thing is, the OEM plugs are iridium which is rated for 100,000kms. So in other words, for a high usage owner, you're looking at after 3 years before entertaining that thought.
It doesn't matter what you eventually settle for, once its not a Qashqai or Sportage. Both are absolute rubbish IMO.
agent007 wrote:The CX5 is a everyday reminder to us that Mazda is on a high and it is over engineered.
We may often get people telling us about a Hyundai, Kia, Suzuki or Chevy which is 99% of the time cheaper etc but I can assure you whilst those brands are okay, a CX5 should really be called Lexus CX5, because it is a precision engineered product made by engineers who may have been top cardiologists in a previous life. Such surgical precision in the way this vehicle moves and operates!
If you follow John Cadogan from Australia (AutoExpert) you would observe that he admits Mazda and Subaru are on a high right now. The CRV is now 29 mths old and still runs like its 1 day old. Our RAV4 is now exactly 72 mths old and to-date we've changed fluids, filters, wiper blades, battery and front brake pads. Toyota's legendary reliability at its best. It's the closest thing we have to a swiss chronograph timepiece and I expect the Mazda to be just as reliable with loads more fun.
agent007 wrote:The 2020 Subaru Impreza 1.6 sedan has arrived, priced at $240,000.
Users browsing this forum: pugboy and 16 guests