Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
EcoTune Trinidad wrote:Well I def have to see dat to believe it...esp it being as fast as you say with a cvt and super gas...if ya race my jetta and beat me I would tune you for free
drchaos wrote:EcoTune Trinidad wrote:Well I def have to see dat to believe it...esp it being as fast as you say with a cvt and super gas...if ya race my jetta and beat me I would tune you for free
Boy I will have to pull out the doors, seats, spare tires, aircon system, infotainment system and loose some weight to even come close to that vw beast you mining in your garage.
pablo_tt wrote:As y'all are talking about the new civic, can a bit of clarification be made? Went to classic POS yesterday and a sales rep told me the 1.6 was going for $229K and the 1.5T was going for 269K
acesinghit wrote:The fun part:
2016 Honda Civic 1.5Turbo with CVT
170hp; 220Nm torque 0-100kmph in 8.2s (Paul Tan)
174hp (USDM); 220Nm torque 0-60mph or 96kmph in 6.8s (Car and Driver)
That is a big difference there (1.4s to be exact)
2016 VW Jetta 1.4 TSI with 7DSG
148hp; 250Nm torque 0-100kmph in 8.6s (manufacturer claim VW UK)
158hp; 240Nm torque 0-100kmph in 8.3s (manufacturer claim VW Australia)
EcoTune, stock for stock it not looking like a win for the Jetta. Like I mentioned earlier, I feel Honda being very conservative with the actual output of their motor or that CVT is super efficient.
Just for kicks:
2016 Hyundai Veloster 1.6 turbo with 6AT
201hp; 265Nm torque 0-100kmph in 7.4s (manufacturer claim)
2013 Nissan Juke 1.6 turbo 6MT
188hp; 240Nm torque 0-100kmph in 8.3s (CARmag, SA)
Reason why I included the 6MT Juke is because that's how Massy imported them in the earlies. I for sure would like to see a 4-way race (bone stock) of these cars locally. Again, the Civic stands out with the least torque.
I wanna see chaos Civic vs a stock Jetta please someone organize this and post a YT vid.
cinco wrote:If it's any consolation the engine we get is actually listed in the sales brochure as an option so it's not just a "lewwe send this to dem third world people" there is a slightly refreshed facelifted 2017 model but no idea when we will get it locally.
Personally I will say the current version is more than adequate and I wouldn't wait on the skyactiv version because the only skyactiv engines listed for the 3 are the 2.0 and 2.5 while they would be mounds better due to our retarded mvt the price would be prohibitive
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Just putting it out there that if you gonna compare things on paper make sure you do better research. The U.K. Jetta no longer uses the twincharger so the specs you quoted don't apply locally.
Gladiator wrote:acesinghit wrote:The fun part:
2016 Honda Civic 1.5Turbo with CVT
170hp; 220Nm torque 0-100kmph in 8.2s (Paul Tan)
174hp (USDM); 220Nm torque 0-60mph or 96kmph in 6.8s (Car and Driver)
That is a big difference there (1.4s to be exact)
2016 VW Jetta 1.4 TSI with 7DSG
148hp; 250Nm torque 0-100kmph in 8.6s (manufacturer claim VW UK)
158hp; 240Nm torque 0-100kmph in 8.3s (manufacturer claim VW Australia)
EcoTune, stock for stock it not looking like a win for the Jetta. Like I mentioned earlier, I feel Honda being very conservative with the actual output of their motor or that CVT is super efficient.
Just for kicks:
2016 Hyundai Veloster 1.6 turbo with 6AT
201hp; 265Nm torque 0-100kmph in 7.4s (manufacturer claim)
2013 Nissan Juke 1.6 turbo 6MT
188hp; 240Nm torque 0-100kmph in 8.3s (CARmag, SA)
Reason why I included the 6MT Juke is because that's how Massy imported them in the earlies. I for sure would like to see a 4-way race (bone stock) of these cars locally. Again, the Civic stands out with the least torque.
I wanna see chaos Civic vs a stock Jetta please someone organize this and post a YT vid.
How does power to weight ratio factor in.... Civics are usually alot lighter than the Euros due to build quality/materials etc.
eliteauto wrote:you guys take life very seriously
eliteauto wrote:
2.3L turbo and 5.0L
drchaos wrote:eliteauto wrote:
2.3L turbo and 5.0L
Who is that Ansa or Maska?
eurotuner wrote:Why buy a 2.3 'stang ewwww :/
.........
That 5.0 price gonna be crazy tho
gastly369 wrote:eurotuner wrote:Why buy a 2.3 'stang ewwww :/
.........
That 5.0 price gonna be crazy tho
Red one passed me a day... sound like a Almera...
eliteauto wrote:
2.3L turbo and 5.0L
drchaos wrote:Someone put on FB that the 5.0 is around 1.2 mil.
baigan wrote:drchaos wrote:Someone put on FB that the 5.0 is around 1.2 mil.
Wtfwho would pay 1.2 mil for a mustang...lol
Dizzy28 wrote:baigan wrote:drchaos wrote:Someone put on FB that the 5.0 is around 1.2 mil.
Wtfwho would pay 1.2 mil for a mustang...lol
A Govnt Minister with the Duty Exemptions would get of these for a good price though.
I could see Colm sitting on a Graco Booster seat going down the foreshore in one of these.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests