Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
drchaos wrote:PariaMan wrote:*KRONIK* wrote:PariaMan wrote:Those 2 engines are a vast improvement I pity the dumb asses who bought an 11 year old engine on a new brand vehicle
To most people... tried and tested beats new and "iffy" anyday.
I for one wish i could get a new qd32 for my frontier. 20 years on the market and still going strong....
Let's not embrace new tech let's use vines for transport
You don't get it ... If you are an early adopter to any new tech you are the beta tester. Some people prefer to go with the older tech with a proven track record and there is nothing wrong with that.
PariaMan wrote:Check the specs out the new engine should be 10 % more efficient. The 2.4 has more torque than the old 3.0. The 2.4 has close to 50% more power than the old 2.5. Clearly there are a few dumb asses around who think that the old engines are better.
PariaMan wrote:Check the specs out the new engine should be 10 % more efficient. The 2.4 has more torque than the old 3.0. The 2.4 has close to 50% more power than the old 2.5. Clearly there are a few dumb asses around who think that the old engines are better.
agent007 wrote:I got the new Hilux SRV 3.0 from TTTL in 2016. I found it to be a beautiful van inside/out and it had descent power but wished it had the side and curtain airbags together with traction/stability control. My major dislike was the poor fuel economy I got and there was another issue which I cannot talk about which was a huge turn off for us. We sold the van with less than 7,000kms on the odometer and replaced it with the new NP300 Frontier. The Nissan is much more powerful but it is a whole lot more fuel efficient too. The YD25 despite being an old-tec design is quite a performer indeed. I really feel sorry for those Hilux owners who purchased the automatic versions for $295k, $325k and $345k respectively. In retrospect, it was a lot of money for a van of that nature. Meanwhile, my good buddy purchased the 2017 refreshed Isuzu D-Max 3.0 “Hi Power” for $262k and he has leather seats, rear camera, touch screen deck, power seat, 18” rims, 4wd, fog lights, projector headlamps with LED DRLs etc etc and it is giving 0 problems and has had no issues with SS from sales to service to-date!
car wrote:Why u cya tork bout the issuse dawg? We have to secrets in here.
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Men does act like talking about issues leads to getting sued or something.
Do van men race each other though? Or do load pulling tests against one another? Take their vans to the track?
PariaMan wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Men does act like talking about issues leads to getting sued or something.
Do van men race each other though? Or do load pulling tests against one another? Take their vans to the track?
Well I have a 2.5 @ 75 KW. I find it underpowered when I have a full load in the tray and have to go up a hill. I then have to put on the low range 4 x 4. I will not buy a 2.5 again with that power and torque. So in the real world power and torque does in fact matter and it is just not a spec on a sheet
zando wrote:Anyone know if I order wiper blades from Amazon if they would be lhd and rhd specific or does it not matter?
InsanityReigns wrote:zando wrote:Anyone know if I order wiper blades from Amazon if they would be lhd and rhd specific or does it not matter?
Doesn’t matter
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests