Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
RedVEVO wrote:hellbent ..
You just purchased the 2017 Colorado ? $289 K ? Tray cover ? Side steps ? Liner ?
Did you test drive or consider the 2016 Amarok ? Just asking.
A business friend owns 2015 Colorado. His choice was based on price.
He has no issues to date. He claims it's "cheap" to maintain. No off-road or construction use.
It is roomy and very little noise. Good size tray. Sits good on the road. But I find it has too much plastic
in the interior (2015). Strange about the commercial inspection in May. Enjoy !
kamakazi wrote:The sticker inside the door recommends 34/35 psi... Wow that sounds a touch high. For comparison the older model hilux recommends 29 psi.
quattro wrote:hellbent wrote:triniboi49 wrote:Any opinions on the 2017 Colorado? How is the resale of the older generation? Anyone can speak to the reliability? I personally like them but I feel if you buy one you are stuck with it till you run it down.
I bought one.
I like it. Coming from a Tiida, so big change for me. I have a friend who bought the older model last year. So been keeping track of it, and he has had no issues with the van.
One thing I do not like about the sales experience with Lifestyle is that I somehow got saddled into having the van inspected. I got mine week before carnival and my inspection is in May. Why can't they get that done for you before they sell you the van? I don't recall having to go through that with Massy. All that just to save 300 on their part?
I had previously posted that my choices were the older Colorado, new Colorado or Audi Q3.
I really wanted to own an Audi, but they are over priced for what you get down here compared to what's on offer say in the US or Europe. Tropicalized they call it, where they strip off features.
I have a friend who got a Q5 (fully loaded) for her birthday, and I got a chance to check it out. Now it's a nice vehicle and I didn't feel any envy at all. There are some features on the Colorado that even her Q5 lacks, CarPlay, Android Auto, Collision Warning, Lane Departure and even a Tire Pressure Monitoring system, remote start, daylight running lights etc.
I do a lot of driving in traffic and I am averaging 10km per liter. When I first got it, and I was driving 40km/h to 50km/h and not as aggressively (first time driving a large van) I had seen my consumption at 11km per liter.
I have not done any real off road driving and only ever used the 4x4 hi mode once.
I think the van does look nice, has a nice "stance".
Feel free to ask anything you wanna know.
Really wasn't a fan of the old Colorado's smiley face but I really like the new one. I think they did a great job with the new styling and from the AU reviews it's a performer as well. With that 25k discount I see lifestyle advertising it really seems like a good buy, esp the way van prices seem to be climbing.
I'm compelled to chook inn a few words for Audi here tho. It's true that the models in stock don't have collision and lane departure warnings, however, they are available as an option for self optioned n ordered vehicles. A lot of the Q5s locally are not the cookie cutter build but optioned out by the customer for purchase. This is why they hardly have them in stock. Having said that, I've never seen a Q5 locally without DRLs and Audi has an ABS based indirect tyre pressure monitoring system:
Indirect TPMS systems don't use the tire pressure sensor unit, but instead measure pressure by monitoring individual wheel rotational speeds. A tire at low pressure will roll at a different wheel speed than tires at higher pressures.
Audi has used both systems in its vehicles, with Direct TPMS being used in earlier Audi models and an Indirect ABS (Antilock Brake System)TPMS system used in later models. The Indirect ABS based TPMS system makes use of the wheel speed sensors that are part of the antilock braking system and electronic stability control system. Audi is the first vehicle manufacturer that is standardizing the ABS based Indirect TPMS system. Downside bein you don't get a readout of the pressures on demand like a direct TPMS system
No excuse for the lack of apple carplay tho, those only come on newly refreshed models throughout the Audi range.
RedVEVO wrote:New Q5 leaks oil and Audi 4 had coil pack problems.
The 3.0 TDI Q7 is excellent . Best SUV ever in TT !
But you have to understand how to deal with service stuff.
Audi's focus in TT is on SALES not SERVICE after spending huge $$$.
After you spend hard earned $$$ there is service issues which are not solved at Audi (SSL).
BMW in TT is different . They invest more with the technicians . They solve problems.
Parts at Audi are outrageously over priced $$$.
Example: Pair side steps for the Audi SUV on Amazon $6000 TT landed. At Audi $22,000.
BMW was taken over by ANSA . ANSA needs to take over Audi
RedVEVO wrote:New Q5 leaks oil and Audi 4 had coil pack problems.
The 3.0 TDI Q7 is excellent . Best SUV ever in TT !
But you have to understand how to deal with service stuff.
Audi's focus in TT is on SALES not SERVICE after spending huge $$$.
After you spend hard earned $$$ there is service issues which are not solved at Audi (SSL).
BMW in TT is different . They invest more with the technicians . They solve problems.
Parts at Audi are outrageously over priced $$$.
Example: Pair side steps for the Audi SUV on Amazon $6000 TT landed. At Audi $22,000.
BMW was taken over by ANSA . ANSA needs to take over Audi
agent007 wrote:I noticed no one in here is talking about the new 2017 Corolla in TTTL showrooms?
Looks like this:
PariaMan wrote:Over priced
metalgear2095 wrote:PariaMan wrote:Over priced
I agree but still less than a civic
Dave wrote:metalgear2095 wrote:PariaMan wrote:Over priced
I agree but still less than a civic
Exactly. So why civic over rola? What's classic point of attraction?
Dave wrote:metalgear2095 wrote:PariaMan wrote:Over priced
I agree but still less than a civic
Exactly. So why civic over rola? What's classic point of attraction?
kamakazi wrote:Boost baby... That is why Civic over Corolla
kamakazi wrote:Which apple are you referring to
Displacement/torque/horsepower/cost/mpg.
Cause there are a lot of metrics that can be compared
If we use Cost per horsepower... Turbo Civic is more cost effecient than the Corolla... But that is a very narrow comparison to use
kamakazi wrote:So forced induction engines from different brands would be in one category and atmospheric engines in another category.
Thing is... value for money is also a category in which all the vehicles mentioned can be compared.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests