Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Well score one for a bigger engined vehicle over a smaller engined turbocharged one. Also reliability could be another key factor when deciding to go with the Lancer. At 200K its a steal. I mean this thing used to cost $255K at one point!
DJ Q wrote:In a nation where gas prices and cost of living is consistently increasing, why would a bigger engine be more appealing?
Small, turbo-charged makes more sense to me.
Pirate wrote:DJ Q wrote:In a nation where gas prices and cost of living is consistently increasing, why would a bigger engine be more appealing?
Small, turbo-charged makes more sense to me.
Hadda buy quick before d turbo tax 'kick eeen'!
DJ Q wrote:Are there any turbo charged engines that can use 92 RON?
Pirate wrote:The 2016 WRX as well can use super.
lostboys crew wrote:My brother in law buying the new lancer when he get the spec sheet I will see.
scotty_buttons wrote:Well check ting. It might move as fast as it looks now.
scotty_buttons wrote:lol. WRX > veloster turbo.
Veloster is just a 1.6 turbo. 200hp I think. Didn't get great reviews either IIRC
racedriverpro wrote:scotty_buttons wrote:lol. WRX > veloster turbo.
Veloster is just a 1.6 turbo. 200hp I think. Didn't get great reviews either IIRC
So the white one is urs?
racedriverpro wrote:scotty_buttons wrote:lol. WRX > veloster turbo.
Veloster is just a 1.6 turbo. 200hp I think. Didn't get great reviews either IIRC
Imo, anything better than Korean...thats just me. Ammmm So the white one is urs?
jedismurf99 wrote:Not sure if anybody posted about this before, but the massy "onetime" system has pricing on all their models if you wanted to know anything official, I think it's nice to have this visibility. http://test.sabix.com/Route is the actual website but you can get there from massymotors.com/onetime as well I believe.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 94 guests