Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Calor wrote:just saw on the newsday..new model BT50
3.2 $290k auto 4x4
2.2 $232k auto 4x4
2.2 $182 manual 4x2
old model 4x4 2.5 fully loaded $199k
tacf85 wrote:It's called value for your money..
tacf85 wrote:Then the resale value speaks for its self. If people choose to spend $60,000 plus for a 7-10yr old Corolla then why buy for features? A car will have a lot of features then can't start in the morning 7yrs after. Then the option is to sell it fast and cheap to get it out your hands.
It shows that Toyota vehicles are always a better choice no matter what you say and can sell with confidence.
Sorry if I'm annoying people with the multiple posting but it's not my fault.
metalgear2095 wrote:Also you were calling 65k for the 2006 Mazda
Morpheus wrote:Ok great experience. Now moving along......
whyteliver wrote:stop....JUS STOP!!!!!!!
Calor wrote:just saw on the newsday..new model BT50
3.2 $290k auto 4x4
2.2 $232k auto 4x4
2.2 $182 manual 4x2
old model 4x4 2.5 fully loaded $199k
Joshie23 wrote:Calor wrote:just saw on the newsday..new model BT50
3.2 $290k auto 4x4
2.2 $232k auto 4x4
2.2 $182 manual 4x2
old model 4x4 2.5 fully loaded $199k
Are you sure?? because I remember being quoted at $245k for the manual 4x4, 2.2L, and it's twin, the Ranger is $289k for the same specs, being 4x4 Automatic 2.2L..
Calor wrote:Joshie23 wrote:Calor wrote:just saw on the newsday..new model BT50
3.2 $290k auto 4x4
2.2 $232k auto 4x4
2.2 $182 manual 4x2
old model 4x4 2.5 fully loaded $199k
Are you sure?? because I remember being quoted at $245k for the manual 4x4, 2.2L, and it's twin, the Ranger is $289k for the same specs, being 4x4 Automatic 2.2L..
Those were the prices on the newsday(special)...
acesinghit wrote:No one squeaked when turbo joy posted his white appliance months ago so why squeak now? tacf, keep yuh head up buddy, yuh riding wit the big boyz now. Toyota ftw!
Joshie23 wrote:I stand corrected, good sir..but that's excellent, at $232k OTR, the Ranger twin would trump all other similarly spec'd pickups on our markets being the 2.5 Auto Hilux 4x4 @ $247k, current Navara 4x4 Auto @ $255k, and well its twin, the Ranger @ $289k..not bad, Mazda..not bad..
Joshie23 wrote:I stand corrected, good sir..but that's excellent, at $232k OTR, the Ranger twin would trump all other similarly spec'd pickups on our markets being the 2.5 Auto Hilux 4x4 @ $247k, current Navara 4x4 Auto @ $255k, and well its twin, the Ranger @ $289k..not bad, Mazda..not bad..
Joshie23 wrote:I stand corrected, good sir..but that's excellent, at $232k OTR, the Ranger twin would trump all other similarly spec'd pickups on our markets being the 2.5 Auto Hilux 4x4 @ $247k, current Navara 4x4 Auto @ $255k, and well its twin, the Ranger @ $289k..not bad, Mazda..not bad..
kamakazi wrote:4x4
I think the model with the Chrome and the extra brake light in the tailgate is like 10k to 15k more
That mazda has a very good price. .. Bosch systems are a bit problematic. .. but that price is darn good.... Also require heavy t i think
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 11 guests