Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:I wouldn't look to the US market for pricing info though. Or at least if I had to compare models I would need to look at trim and engine etc. US philosophy is to have open market on fuels and no engine tax. So the initial vehicle price is cheaper but you end up spending a sheitload on fuel afterwards. Fuel is subsidized here and the mvt rises exponentially based on engine size so no surprise the Q7 with a large engine is taxed like that. It's a form of governance to *try* to not let the fuel subsidy go out of control.
I also think you should compare our cars to those in other RHD markets. Take the UK for example. A jetta there costs more than it does here. A jetta in the US costs substantially less on surface value. Why? They are different trims with the US version being a skimped down version. When you're checking price differences you may need to dig a bit deeper to see what exactly is being offered.
I dunno about roro though. That's used so I don't think you can be surprised the new vehicle costs more than the 4 to 5 year old one.
Stephon. wrote:Lot's of people don't know that most vehicles in America from the dealer that cost around that 15k bracket doesn't come with a lot of features that we get here in Trinidad. My sister brought an Elantra n Arizona recently, she paid around 26k and the advertised prices was around 16k. The 16k model came without airconditioning, without steering mounted controls, without fog lights, no sunroof, no bluetooth, no navigation, manual transmission etc. After she choose the fully loaded with all the features we get locally plus navigation, etc. the price jumped from 16k to 26k. Can you imagine they still sell cars without air conditioning in America![]()
The last model of base model BT-50s didn't come with air-conditioning either, southern sales put them in when they touch down in Trinidad
Stephon. wrote:WTF is haggling?
Stephon. wrote:Well I could respond to the bits that were in English, like the fact that you posted a link to an Elantra with a smaller engine, less features and customization to the one bought for 26k but alright then.
Ya tried and ya tried hard tho
tourniquet wrote:that's cool, would you mind sharing the links to those awards?Stephon. wrote:Do you know that the new bt50 have already won two awards in the design depertmant and was even called the most beautiful pick up in the world?wow I didn't realize thatStephon. wrote:Do you know that the price hike in the new bt50 happened all around the world and not just Trinidad, jumping from 30 grand to 50 grand in the us.I didn't even know they started selling the BT-50 in the US
again, could you share the links?Stephon. wrote: Do you know that the fully loaded bt50s come with a flare kit, better handling than any other pick up in the market (this is proven) and the best off roading capable pick up in the market even when compared to the new ranger???
DJ Q wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:I wouldn't look to the US market for pricing info though. Or at least if I had to compare models I would need to look at trim and engine etc. US philosophy is to have open market on fuels and no engine tax. So the initial vehicle price is cheaper but you end up spending a sheitload on fuel afterwards. Fuel is subsidized here and the mvt rises exponentially based on engine size so no surprise the Q7 with a large engine is taxed like that. It's a form of governance to *try* to not let the fuel subsidy go out of control.
I also think you should compare our cars to those in other RHD markets. Take the UK for example. A jetta there costs more than it does here. A jetta in the US costs substantially less on surface value. Why? They are different trims with the US version being a skimped down version. When you're checking price differences you may need to dig a bit deeper to see what exactly is being offered.
I dunno about roro though. That's used so I don't think you can be surprised the new vehicle costs more than the 4 to 5 year old one.
I take your point. Very valid.
However, now that subsidies are slowly being lifted... what's the justification?
tourniquet wrote:speaking of waiting on an answer:tourniquet wrote:that's cool, would you mind sharing the links to those awards?Stephon. wrote:Do you know that the new bt50 have already won two awards in the design depertmant and was even called the most beautiful pick up in the world?wow I didn't realize thatStephon. wrote:Do you know that the price hike in the new bt50 happened all around the world and not just Trinidad, jumping from 30 grand to 50 grand in the us.I didn't even know they started selling the BT-50 in the US
again, could you share the links?Stephon. wrote: Do you know that the fully loaded bt50s come with a flare kit, better handling than any other pick up in the market (this is proven) and the best off roading capable pick up in the market even when compared to the new ranger???
Renaldo25 wrote:while u guys argue over the price of a us elantra, which would u choose the veloster or i30?
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:DJ Q wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:I wouldn't look to the US market for pricing info though. Or at least if I had to compare models I would need to look at trim and engine etc. US philosophy is to have open market on fuels and no engine tax. So the initial vehicle price is cheaper but you end up spending a sheitload on fuel afterwards. Fuel is subsidized here and the mvt rises exponentially based on engine size so no surprise the Q7 with a large engine is taxed like that. It's a form of governance to *try* to not let the fuel subsidy go out of control.
I also think you should compare our cars to those in other RHD markets. Take the UK for example. A jetta there costs more than it does here. A jetta in the US costs substantially less on surface value. Why? They are different trims with the US version being a skimped down version. When you're checking price differences you may need to dig a bit deeper to see what exactly is being offered.
I dunno about roro though. That's used so I don't think you can be surprised the new vehicle costs more than the 4 to 5 year old one.
I take your point. Very valid.
However, now that subsidies are slowly being lifted... what's the justification?
The new drive for the future will be pushing the population to adopt cng as environmentally cleaner than gasoline and diesel. Removing the subsidy pushes masses towards cng which will be priced cheaper and possibly have other incentives to get a person to switch. They may likewise leave the MVT on gas and diesel vehicles to further push you to buy a cng vehicle by say not putting an MVT on it.
All of this will take time. Years because it takes time to adjust subsidies (political suicide) and year to put cng infrastructure in place but it is coming.
DJ Q wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:DJ Q wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:I wouldn't look to the US market for pricing info though. Or at least if I had to compare models I would need to look at trim and engine etc. US philosophy is to have open market on fuels and no engine tax. So the initial vehicle price is cheaper but you end up spending a sheitload on fuel afterwards. Fuel is subsidized here and the mvt rises exponentially based on engine size so no surprise the Q7 with a large engine is taxed like that. It's a form of governance to *try* to not let the fuel subsidy go out of control.
I also think you should compare our cars to those in other RHD markets. Take the UK for example. A jetta there costs more than it does here. A jetta in the US costs substantially less on surface value. Why? They are different trims with the US version being a skimped down version. When you're checking price differences you may need to dig a bit deeper to see what exactly is being offered.
I dunno about roro though. That's used so I don't think you can be surprised the new vehicle costs more than the 4 to 5 year old one.
I take your point. Very valid.
However, now that subsidies are slowly being lifted... what's the justification?
The new drive for the future will be pushing the population to adopt cng as environmentally cleaner than gasoline and diesel. Removing the subsidy pushes masses towards cng which will be priced cheaper and possibly have other incentives to get a person to switch. They may likewise leave the MVT on gas and diesel vehicles to further push you to buy a cng vehicle by say not putting an MVT on it.
All of this will take time. Years because it takes time to adjust subsidies (political suicide) and year to put cng infrastructure in place but it is coming.
I take all of your points. They are all very valid and are all very good information.
Thanks for that.
However I have yet another question:
If we are heavily charged taxes to avoid abuse of the subsidy, and the subsidy is lifted... why are we still heavily charged for those same cars?
Why is the government encouraging us to move backwards to CNG? The move forward would be to hydrogen, electrically powered cars or even simple hybrids.
I'm not targeting anything at you personally, I just don't understand the thought process involved here.
But I must reiterate, you have very good info there.
cinco wrote:Stephon. wrote:Well I could respond to the bits that were in English, like the fact that you posted a link to an Elantra with a smaller engine, less features and customization to the one bought for 26k but alright then.
Ya tried and ya tried hard tho
smaller engine?
your sister got the only elantra in the us with a different engine other than the ONLY 1.8 right right
https://www.hyundaiusa.com/vehicles/201 ... mance.aspx?
cinco wrote:reply to what?
its easy to oversell a car to stupid ppl in the states i know ppl who paid in excess of 45k for camrys
btw i have nothing to prove to u
anyone who wants real facts about car sales in the US can contact me
cinco wrote:reply to what?
its easy to oversell a car to stupid ppl in the states i know ppl who paid in excess of 45k for camrys
btw i have nothing to prove to u
anyone who wants real facts about car sales in the US can contact me
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests