TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
299 wrote:which NA 1600 cc engine nissan build could mke specs like this stock
B16A SiR II
Displacement (cc): 1595
Power (bhp@rpm): 170@7600
Torque (ft/lbs@rpm): 116@7000
Compression Ratio: 10.4:1
Bore (mm): 81
Stroke (mm): 77.4
Cam Design: dohc
VTEC?: yes
OBD: 1
Year(s) Produced: 1992-1995
wagonrunner wrote:hmm, there's this one..............
SR16VE
Displacement, cc: 1596
Power (bhp@rpm): 172@7800
Torque (ft/lbs@rpm): 119@7200
Compression Ratio: 11:1
Engine type: Water cooling serial 4 cylinder DOHC16 valve
Engine information: NEOVVL
Fuel system: NISSAN EGI (ECCS) (electronic gasoline injection)
Turbocharger: No
Bore, mm 86
Stroke, mm 68.7
VTEC?: HELL NO!!
yuh beleive 1cc make all that difference?
wagonrunner wrote:how does the stock nissan SR16VE compare to the stock Honda B16a?
3stagevtec wrote:wagonrunner wrote:hmm, there's this one..............
SR16VE
Displacement, cc: 1596
Power (bhp@rpm): 172@7800
Torque (ft/lbs@rpm): 119@7200
Compression Ratio: 11:1
Engine type: Water cooling serial 4 cylinder DOHC16 valve
Engine information: NEOVVL
Fuel system: NISSAN EGI (ECCS) (electronic gasoline injection)
Turbocharger: No
Bore, mm 86
Stroke, mm 68.7
VTEC?: HELL NO!!
yuh beleive 1cc make all that difference?
here's my reply...
B16B
VTEC
Found in:
1997-2000 Civic Type-R
Displacement: 1595 cm³
Compression: 10.8:1
Power: 185 hp (137 kW) @ 8200 rpm & 118 ft·lbf (160 N·m) @ 7500 rpm
Transmission: S4C With LSD
and with 1cc less too...
Mercury, Mazda, break into top-10 rank; Infiniti, Chevrolet plunge in standings
Yonkers, NY – Consumer Reports’ largest Annual Car Reliability Survey ranks Lexus in first place for predicted reliability of its 2006 models among 36 nameplates from domestic, European, and Asian automakers. Lexus was in second place last year behind Scion in CR’s survey.
Honda moved into second place, from fifth, and Toyota remained unchanged in third place. Mitsubishi ranked fourth, up from seventh overall, and Subaru ranked in fifth place, down one in the standings from last year.
Predicted reliability for both Mercury and Mazda models moved sharply higher. Mercury is now ranked in eighth place, up from 16th last year; it’s the only domestic manufacturer to break into the top-10 in the standings. Mazda was up eight places as well and finished in ninth, behind Mercury.
Infiniti, which has traditionally been known for making vehicles with outstanding reliability, plunged 20 places in the standings, dropping to 28th from eighth. Its QX56 was the most unreliable vehicle among new cars. Scion dropped from first place last year to seventh this year. Volvo moved up 10 places to 12th overall, and Mini moved up eighteen places, to 11th overall.
Among domestic manufacturers, Chevrolet dropped to 24th, down from 13th last year. Chrysler moved up to 15th place from 20th in 2005, and Jeep dropped five places to 19th. Ford dropped to 16th place from 15th, and Dodge moved up three places to 18th overall.
Porsche placed dead last in the rankings, at 36th overall, down from 26th last year based solely on the problematic Cayenne SUV.
Predicted reliability findings and a five-year reliability trend story are published in Consumer Reports’ Annual April Auto Issue, which goes on sale beginning Tuesday, March 7. The Auto Issue will be available wherever magazines are sold and may also be ordered online at www.ConsumerReports.org. Free highlights from the April Auto Issue are available at www.ConsumerReports.org/autos2006.
3stagevtec wrote:Reliability anyone...Mercury, Mazda, break into top-10 rank; Infiniti, Chevrolet plunge in standings
Yonkers, NY – Consumer Reports’ largest Annual Car Reliability Survey ranks Lexus in first place for predicted reliability of its 2006 models among 36 nameplates from domestic, European, and Asian automakers. Lexus was in second place last year behind Scion in CR’s survey.
Honda moved into second place, from fifth, and Toyota remained unchanged in third place. Mitsubishi ranked fourth, up from seventh overall, and Subaru ranked in fifth place, down one in the standings from last year.
lets stick to trinidad.....
Predicted reliability for both Mercury and Mazda models moved sharply higher. Mercury is now ranked in eighth place, up from 16th last year; it’s the only domestic manufacturer to break into the top-10 in the standings. Mazda was up eight places as well and finished in ninth, behind Mercury.
Infiniti, which has traditionally been known for making vehicles with outstanding reliability, plunged 20 places in the standings, dropping to 28th from eighth. Its QX56 was the most unreliable vehicle among new cars. Scion dropped from first place last year to seventh this year. Volvo moved up 10 places to 12th overall, and Mini moved up eighteen places, to 11th overall.
Among domestic manufacturers, Chevrolet dropped to 24th, down from 13th last year. Chrysler moved up to 15th place from 20th in 2005, and Jeep dropped five places to 19th. Ford dropped to 16th place from 15th, and Dodge moved up three places to 18th overall.
Porsche placed dead last in the rankings, at 36th overall, down from 26th last year based solely on the problematic Cayenne SUV.
Predicted reliability findings and a five-year reliability trend story are published in Consumer Reports’ Annual April Auto Issue, which goes on sale beginning Tuesday, March 7. The Auto Issue will be available wherever magazines are sold and may also be ordered online at www.ConsumerReports.org. Free highlights from the April Auto Issue are available at www.ConsumerReports.org/autos2006.
Chiney wrote:honda cars are paper.. they are damn light...thats another factor there..
remember the time..cant remember how long back.. that there were 9 crashes one after de other.. with like 1-2 weeks intervals which they all were civics..
and all of dem fold up like paper...
lastminuteaudio wrote:i saw this on tuner once: " If NISMO stands for nissan motorsports, what does HOMO stand for?"....
the reason why they "fold up like paper" is because they were designed that way. The car crushes under impact to absorb the crash energy or momentum and thus reduces the impact its passengers will feel. in other words, they fold up like paper to save your life...
wait that is not the same motor that nissan could only make 1000 of?
and honda make how many b16b????
Dragsta wrote:the reason why they "fold up like paper" is because they were designed that way. The car crushes under impact to absorb the crash energy or momentum and thus reduces the impact its passengers will feel. in other words, they fold up like paper to save your life...
so iz da why hondas are so famous for crashing and killing ppl
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests
. and dais stock.
