Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
HUTRINI wrote:hahahaha
so that K20 is in no way built? yall are some firetruck haters to the nth degree...suppose that was a 11 sec or 12 sec hatch he had there...
alyuh acting as if the man put in a stock k20 and call that george and decide to make a FAKE video to boost his own ego![]()
an N/A honda hatch producing 250+ w.h.p. with full weight reduction, good shifting, suitable suspension and tyre combo= 10 to 11 secs yall need to realse that and wake up from that sleep
HUTRINI wrote:From the second roll-YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE THE SUPRA SQUATTING-the driver was ON IT
From the dig-you guys said that the supra was catching the hatch-it clearly takes OVER 20+ SECONDS for this to occur-by this time the 1/4 mile wouldve been LONG GONE(1:15-1:36)...talk done the supra got
Banzai Rastafarai wrote:HUTRINI wrote:From the second roll-YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE THE SUPRA SQUATTING-the driver was ON IT
From the dig-you guys said that the supra was catching the hatch-it clearly takes OVER 20+ SECONDS for this to occur-by this time the 1/4 mile wouldve been LONG GONE(1:15-1:36)...talk done the supra got
i timed the DIG run.....he didnt stop accelerating till about 17 seconds into the run....so "quarter mile run" my arse...he was going for th long haul and realized that the Supra was relling him in quickly......same for th Evo run......thais why he asked for a second run...cudnt bleive it...
Banzai Rastafarai wrote:HUTRINI wrote:From the second roll-YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE THE SUPRA SQUATTING-the driver was ON IT
From the dig-you guys said that the supra was catching the hatch-it clearly takes OVER 20+ SECONDS for this to occur-by this time the 1/4 mile wouldve been LONG GONE(1:15-1:36)...talk done the supra got
i timed the DIG run.....he didnt stop accelerating till about 17 seconds into the run....so "quarter mile run" my arse...he was going for th long haul and realized that the Supra was relling him in quickly......same for th Evo run......thais why he asked for a second run...cudnt bleive it...
HUTRINI wrote:on the street of course the supra wouldve owned him...more litres, and certainly more power and gearing to boot...but on the 1320 the hatch wouldve ran all over it...it took well over 17 secs for the supra to even reel in the hatch, and its doing LOW LOWWWW 13's(almost high 12's) on street tyres...
yall need to get outta that old attitude- find real ppl in trini stuck in that mentality that if it not boosted it cant be fast...NO TOBO NO FASS ENT? stueps...wake up its 2007 ppl
HUTRINI wrote:yall need to get outta that old attitude- find real ppl in trini stuck in that mentality that if it not boosted it cant be fast...NO TOBO NO FASS ENT? stueps...wake up its 2007 ppl
i´m not hating on your car or on you. But it just seems that if that supra has all those mods then there must be something very wrong with it.
Your best time on in 1/4 is the same as a Stock TT supra would run
That supra and the evo owned by same dude
stephanweaver wrote:and these small 1.6 displacement engines dont have much torque.
we have to make up for loss of torque with good gearing and hp numbers.
stephanweaver wrote:red, i take up that challange, but i wouldnt hit no 11seconds.
i aiming for 13's on a NA b16.
stock block. no bottle.
too bad we dont have a track to race anymore.
red, beleive it or not. i actually raced a couple turbo lancers and won.
i even ran a lancer with a 4g63t, beat that bad on the 1320. but the way he was catching up to me in 3rd..... im sure on the streets im no match.
what i really trying to say is.... people dont realise that a car can be fast without the cold.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests