Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
its in all our interests that the numbers remain low. if for some reason, we manage to get every body tested, that SHOULD get tested, and the numbers go up, nobody wins. all we get is to say, 'yes, rowley dem lie, it worse than we know'.Kenjo wrote:Those other countries weren’t taking us for a ride when they originally gave their corona death numbers then . I guess we are just getting a delayed experience . Surprised most of the families aren’t jumping on social media by they are probably afraid of being scorned for corona because they probably have it too. Relatives still liming and coming back home to their older ‘ comorbidities ‘ parents , grand parents , aunties and uncles .
sMASH wrote:its in all our interests that the numbers remain low. if for some reason, we manage to get every body tested, that SHOULD get tested, and the numbers go up, nobody wins. all we get is to say, 'yes, rowley dem lie, it worse than we know'.Kenjo wrote:Those other countries weren’t taking us for a ride when they originally gave their corona death numbers then . I guess we are just getting a delayed experience . Surprised most of the families aren’t jumping on social media by they are probably afraid of being scorned for corona because they probably have it too. Relatives still liming and coming back home to their older ‘ comorbidities ‘ parents , grand parents , aunties and uncles .
and them donkeys wills still vote for him out of spite for sharing the truth.
Kenjo wrote:sMASH wrote:its in all our interests that the numbers remain low. if for some reason, we manage to get every body tested, that SHOULD get tested, and the numbers go up, nobody wins. all we get is to say, 'yes, rowley dem lie, it worse than we know'.Kenjo wrote:Those other countries weren’t taking us for a ride when they originally gave their corona death numbers then . I guess we are just getting a delayed experience . Surprised most of the families aren’t jumping on social media by they are probably afraid of being scorned for corona because they probably have it too. Relatives still liming and coming back home to their older ‘ comorbidities ‘ parents , grand parents , aunties and uncles .
and them donkeys wills still vote for him out of spite for sharing the truth.
Precisely, people don’t realise that a lot of lawyers have no real morals/ ethics who would gladly willingly push to find a loophole and put it out in the open . As to why they can’t inform the authorities by the side and be like ‘ aye I not going to make any fan fair but allyuh need to fix this up in your laws’ but they basically hoping lots of people dead which may happen anyway. But let’s encourage people thAt liming is a must . If we had failed for carnival it would have been Trinidad to catch but clearly we weren’t hearing about random people who died on the ward in hospital or ones at home .
sMASH wrote:its in all our interests that the numbers remain low. if for some reason, we manage to get every body tested, that SHOULD get tested, and the numbers go up, nobody wins. all we get is to say, 'yes, rowley dem lie, it worse than we know'.Kenjo wrote:Those other countries weren’t taking us for a ride when they originally gave their corona death numbers then . I guess we are just getting a delayed experience . Surprised most of the families aren’t jumping on social media by they are probably afraid of being scorned for corona because they probably have it too. Relatives still liming and coming back home to their older ‘ comorbidities ‘ parents , grand parents , aunties and uncles .
and them donkeys wills still vote for him out of spite for sharing the truth.
Don't you feel cheated and conned by the goverment?pete wrote:The test figures continue to not make sense. This morning completed tests (unique + repeated) added up to total tests submitted to the labs. This afternoon the total test number increased by 83 but 101 new cases.
I get the feeling the people in charge of releasing that info are getting overwhelmed. For the past couple weeks there have been a few strange things showing up in the reports.
aaron17 wrote:Remember when they say one who die is too much in the conference saturday? So what is 50+ then? Apocolypse? And they bringing up the ppl who take out the oxygen to blame.
Legal notice removes guideline stipulation for places of worship
JULIEN NEAVES 17 HRS AGO
A diagram from legal notice 316 demonstrating the stipulated seating on public transportation vehicles
THE NEW legal notice on the Public Health Ordinance has made changes to regulations regarding places of worship, likely in a response to a recent court ruling.
The ruling was made on Friday by Justice Ronnie Boodoosingh on two constitutional claims which challenged the validity of the coronavirus public health regulations.
Before him were two separate claims – one brought by Pundit Satyanand Maharaj and another by five men – Dominic Suraj, Marlon Hinds, Christopher Wilson, Bruce Bowen and Collin Ramjohn – who were arrested at Alicia’s Guest House in St Ann’s at an alleged covid19 party on April 9. They were later charged with breaching the regulations. These were the first cases to test the covid19 regulations.
In his decision, Boodoosingh held that the regulations made by the minister were permissible under the public health ordinance.
However, Boodoosingh said, “Making the breach of the Ministry of Health guidelines a criminal offence, in my view, is outside of the ambit of the powers given to the minister under the (Public Health) Ordinance.
“This amounts to the minister authorising regulations which criminalise conduct which, in several instances, are uncertain and vague or expressed as non-mandatory practices. Such a provision is not a valid or legitimate exercise of the powers under the ordinance.”
Legal notice 316 Section 4(5) stated a religious or ecclesiastical organisation or any other religious organisation may conduct various religious where the gathering of persons at any place used for that purpose does not exceed ten persons and the organisation comply with the guidelines for places of worship issued by the Ministry of Health. The new legal notice, however, removes the requirement to comply with the guidelines.
The legal notice also included a new Section 15 which states: "The Minister of Health may, for the purpose of the operation of these regulations issue such guidelines as he may deem necessary and breach of such guidelines shall not constitute an offence."
The legal notice also referred to Schedule 3 on the capacity of public transportation vehicles in accordance with the Prime Minister's announcement on Saturday that seating capacity would be increased from 50 per cent to about 65 per cent.
Schedule 3 states: "Public transportation vehicles may be allowed to transport only as many passengers as can be afforded window-seating, in accordance with the size and make of the vehicle. This guideline therefore would preclude the occupation of any middle-seat spaces in any vehicle with seating extending across the width of the passenger cabin.
"In all instances, passengers are to be required to wear face-coverings (preferably masks) for the duration of their journey; and windows are to be kept fully opened, as far as practicable, to allow for optimal circulation of air through the vehicle."
what was the response tendered?pete wrote:The response to the very valid question about the increase in %age of positive cases really didn't sit well with me..
The_Honourable wrote:Laboratory Confirmed Covid-19 Cases in T&T's Phase 2 (June - September 13th, does not include repatriation)
redmanjp wrote:hmm. 15% of men who died were under the age of 50. including men in their 30s !
83% are male. allyuh ready to die?
Are you?redmanjp wrote:hmm. 15% of men who died were under the age of 50. including men in their 30s !
83% are male. allyuh ready to die?
K74T wrote:Are you?redmanjp wrote:hmm. 15% of men who died were under the age of 50. including men in their 30s !
83% are male. allyuh ready to die?
pete wrote:redmanjp wrote:hmm. 15% of men who died were under the age of 50. including men in their 30s !
83% are male. allyuh ready to die?
This is probably due to the fact that men weren't wearing masks and/or were going into settings where they were likely to contract it.
Who said anything about fearing death?shake d livin wake d dead wrote:K74T wrote:Are you?redmanjp wrote:hmm. 15% of men who died were under the age of 50. including men in their 30s !
83% are male. allyuh ready to die?
We all have to at some point in time. You must not fear death
meccalli wrote:Yep, younger males have been severely affected. Heard of one who developed kidney complications post infection, mid thirties.
redmanjp wrote:meccalli wrote:Yep, younger males have been severely affected. Heard of one who developed kidney complications post infection, mid thirties.
in the next few months we will see what the long term effects on survivors have on the public health system
That's what trump said.pete wrote:That it shows the success of the testing strategy.
Even though internationally a successful testing strategy produces fewer than 5% positives.
https://www.trinituner.com/v4/forums/viewtopic.php?p=10086064#p10086064redmanjp wrote:pete wrote:redmanjp wrote:hmm. 15% of men who died were under the age of 50. including men in their 30s !
83% are male. allyuh ready to die?
This is probably due to the fact that men weren't wearing masks and/or were going into settings where they were likely to contract it.
males make up 53% of cases but 83% of deaths. that alone would not explain it. i think it has to do with males having only 1 X chromosome
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 73 guests