Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
^^^ All yuh think is Joke I does be telling all yuh .sMASH wrote:zoom, u know ting from inside all along?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hire a few seniors and a set a laborers????zoom rader wrote:Hoss skilled workers would have spotted it and reported it . They did not or Management turned a blind eye for production in favor of safety.jhonnieblue wrote:Dan, u pushing it with that stupid talk now. It have real men in their with plenty exp from various plants. Don't insults them with u're red govt logic please.
Yes we know u have a issue with PNM, but don't drag those workers into it.
That issue with the plant is due to shortcomings with mechanical integrity and PSM.
Where safety is of concern operations would have stopped and do a root cause.
They all to blame and I don't give to figs about it
The attitude they took is that of the red government behaviour.
This red government behavour must never be employed in dangerous working environments.
I would not trust anything from these people, they are all red government influenced .K74T wrote:
K74T wrote:FB_IMG_1617900746376.jpeg
De Dragon wrote:K74T wrote:FB_IMG_1617900746376.jpeg
"Despatch"? Really?
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:K74T wrote:FB_IMG_1617900746376.jpeg
"Despatch"? Really?
Its actually correct.
GORTT docs come with a stamp spelt the same way.
Di is speed-to act with Dispatch
De is Sending and delivery related.
So the dEspatched team should have acted with dIspatch.
Waste of time, nothing will come out of this.K74T wrote:Ministry of Energy and Energy Industries
Media Release
MEEI TECHNICAL TEAM TO INVESTIGATE NIQUAN’S INCIDENT
The Ministry of Energy and Energy Industries (MEEI) wishes to inform the Media and the public that in accordance to the Petroleum Act, Chap. 62:01 and the Petroleum Regulations, the MEEI has established a technical team and has commenced investigations into the explosion at the NiQuan GTL Plant at Point-a-Pierre which occurred on April 7th, 2021. The mandate of the technical team is as follows:
1) Establish the facts of the incident;
2) Conduct a thorough investigation and contributing factors to determine the root cause(s) of the explosion;
3) Review the adequacy of existing controls and procedures;
4) Make recommendations which could reduce future risks and prevent recurrences; and
5) Prepare a final report which would be delivered to the Honourable Minister of Energy and
Energy Industries and other key stakeholders.
The technical team that will be conducting the investigation are as follows
1. Craig Boodoo, Senior Petroleum Engineer (Team Lead) and Acting Head Petroleum Operations Management Division
2. Yashi Carrington , Senior Chemical Engineer (Ag.)
3. Sean Mahabir, Mechanical Engineer II
4. Omattee Mathura, Petroleum Inspector III
5. Neisha Dipnarine, Mechanical Engineer
6. Shazil Yarsien, Chemical Engineer
Additionally, the services of Subject Matter Experts would be used as may be required. The team will submit a final report in the shortest possible timeframe.
The MEEI, Occupational Health and Safety Authority and Agency, and the Trinidad and Tobago Fire Services would be conducting independent investigations. Operations at Niquan Energy will only resume after approval from these agencies.
For more information please contact Senior Communications Officer, Mr. Choy Felix at cfelix@energy.gov.tt
Like yuh hAVe experience baizoom rader wrote:Waste of time, nothing will come out of this.K74T wrote:Ministry of Energy and Energy Industries
Media Release
MEEI TECHNICAL TEAM TO INVESTIGATE NIQUAN’S INCIDENT
The Ministry of Energy and Energy Industries (MEEI) wishes to inform the Media and the public that in accordance to the Petroleum Act, Chap. 62:01 and the Petroleum Regulations, the MEEI has established a technical team and has commenced investigations into the explosion at the NiQuan GTL Plant at Point-a-Pierre which occurred on April 7th, 2021. The mandate of the technical team is as follows:
1) Establish the facts of the incident;
2) Conduct a thorough investigation and contributing factors to determine the root cause(s) of the explosion;
3) Review the adequacy of existing controls and procedures;
4) Make recommendations which could reduce future risks and prevent recurrences; and
5) Prepare a final report which would be delivered to the Honourable Minister of Energy and
Energy Industries and other key stakeholders.
The technical team that will be conducting the investigation are as follows
1. Craig Boodoo, Senior Petroleum Engineer (Team Lead) and Acting Head Petroleum Operations Management Division
2. Yashi Carrington , Senior Chemical Engineer (Ag.)
3. Sean Mahabir, Mechanical Engineer II
4. Omattee Mathura, Petroleum Inspector III
5. Neisha Dipnarine, Mechanical Engineer
6. Shazil Yarsien, Chemical Engineer
Additionally, the services of Subject Matter Experts would be used as may be required. The team will submit a final report in the shortest possible timeframe.
The MEEI, Occupational Health and Safety Authority and Agency, and the Trinidad and Tobago Fire Services would be conducting independent investigations. Operations at Niquan Energy will only resume after approval from these agencies.
For more information please contact Senior Communications Officer, Mr. Choy Felix at cfelix@energy.gov.tt
Massive cover up will come from these red government stooges.
A creditable overseas team of investigators is needed for this.
Locals cannot be trusted, they are all red government influenced.
Writing is on the wall for these hand picked choosen idiotssMASH wrote:This wsnt a chemical problem, it was a mechanical/process problem.
They ahve a whole team of chemists to figure out a vessel blown out.
That team should ahve Comprised mechanical engineers specializing in condition monitoring and process engineers and technicians. And oneeeee chemical person, with experience in petroleum engineering, jsut to verify that the chemicals at that stage of the process were the only things.
They will come to false conclusions, hit u a 6 for 9 recommendations, they budget a pong and crown to retrofit, and resume operations.
Plant Wil start back, and blow out again. And they will patch back restart blow out.
And that will go on and on till the whole plant fix back by patches.
Wax formation is due to low temps. That might be due to end of run catalyst, insufficient instrumentation, or they put a pipe fitter to operate the reactor.
sMASH wrote:This wsnt a chemical problem, it was a mechanical/process problem.
They ahve a whole team of chemists to figure out a vessel blown out.
That team should ahve Comprised mechanical engineers specializing in condition monitoring and process engineers and technicians. And oneeeee chemical person, with experience in petroleum engineering, jsut to verify that the chemicals at that stage of the process were the only things.
They will come to false conclusions, hit u a 6 for 9 recommendations, they budget a pong and crown to retrofit, and resume operations.
Plant Wil start back, and blow out again. And they will patch back restart blow out.
And that will go on and on till the whole plant fix back by patches.
Wax formation is due to low temps. That might be due to end of run catalyst, insufficient instrumentation, or they put a pipe fitter to operate the reactor.
De Dragon wrote:K74T wrote:FB_IMG_1617900746376.jpeg
"Despatch"? Really?
Hahahaha. The first and second paragraph is so much bollocks. But then again...sMASH wrote:This wsnt a chemical problem, it was a mechanical/process problem.
They ahve a whole team of chemists to figure out a vessel blown out.
That team should ahve Comprised mechanical engineers specializing in condition monitoring and process engineers and technicians. And oneeeee chemical person, with experience in petroleum engineering, jsut to verify that the chemicals at that stage of the process were the only things.
They will come to false conclusions, hit u a 6 for 9 recommendations, they budget a pong and crown to retrofit, and resume operations.
Plant Wil start back, and blow out again. And they will patch back restart blow out.
And that will go on and on till the whole plant fix back by patches.
Wax formation is due to low temps. That might be due to end of run catalyst, insufficient instrumentation, or they put a pipe fitter to operate the reactor.
carluva wrote:Hahahaha. The first and second paragraph is so much bollocks. But then again...sMASH wrote:This wsnt a chemical problem, it was a mechanical/process problem.
They ahve a whole team of chemists to figure out a vessel blown out.
That team should ahve Comprised mechanical engineers specializing in condition monitoring and process engineers and technicians. And oneeeee chemical person, with experience in petroleum engineering, jsut to verify that the chemicals at that stage of the process were the only things.
They will come to false conclusions, hit u a 6 for 9 recommendations, they budget a pong and crown to retrofit, and resume operations.
Plant Wil start back, and blow out again. And they will patch back restart blow out.
And that will go on and on till the whole plant fix back by patches.
Wax formation is due to low temps. That might be due to end of run catalyst, insufficient instrumentation, or they put a pipe fitter to operate the reactor.
A chemical engineer is not a chemist. A chemical engineer with the MEEI is what is known as a process engineer.
And I can tell you from personal experience that when MEEI and OSH get involved this is treated with utmost gravity and is devoid of governmental interference.
But do continue with the blather.
Wait nah Redman have double account?De Dragon wrote:carluva wrote:Hahahaha. The first and second paragraph is so much bollocks. But then again...sMASH wrote:This wsnt a chemical problem, it was a mechanical/process problem.
They ahve a whole team of chemists to figure out a vessel blown out.
That team should ahve Comprised mechanical engineers specializing in condition monitoring and process engineers and technicians. And oneeeee chemical person, with experience in petroleum engineering, jsut to verify that the chemicals at that stage of the process were the only things.
They will come to false conclusions, hit u a 6 for 9 recommendations, they budget a pong and crown to retrofit, and resume operations.
Plant Wil start back, and blow out again. And they will patch back restart blow out.
And that will go on and on till the whole plant fix back by patches.
Wax formation is due to low temps. That might be due to end of run catalyst, insufficient instrumentation, or they put a pipe fitter to operate the reactor.
A chemical engineer is not a chemist. A chemical engineer with the MEEI is what is known as a process engineer.
And I can tell you from personal experience that when MEEI and OSH get involved this is treated with utmost gravity and is devoid of governmental interference.
But do continue with the blather.
Red Colostomy Bag, dais you?
Why is it "bollocks" exactly
zoom rader wrote:Wait nah Redman have double account?De Dragon wrote:carluva wrote:Hahahaha. The first and second paragraph is so much bollocks. But then again...sMASH wrote:This wsnt a chemical problem, it was a mechanical/process problem.
They ahve a whole team of chemists to figure out a vessel blown out.
That team should ahve Comprised mechanical engineers specializing in condition monitoring and process engineers and technicians. And oneeeee chemical person, with experience in petroleum engineering, jsut to verify that the chemicals at that stage of the process were the only things.
They will come to false conclusions, hit u a 6 for 9 recommendations, they budget a pong and crown to retrofit, and resume operations.
Plant Wil start back, and blow out again. And they will patch back restart blow out.
And that will go on and on till the whole plant fix back by patches.
Wax formation is due to low temps. That might be due to end of run catalyst, insufficient instrumentation, or they put a pipe fitter to operate the reactor.
A chemical engineer is not a chemist. A chemical engineer with the MEEI is what is known as a process engineer.
And I can tell you from personal experience that when MEEI and OSH get involved this is treated with utmost gravity and is devoid of governmental interference.
But do continue with the blather.
Red Colostomy Bag, dais you?
Why is it "bollocks" exactly
It seems another red government argent is feed him misleading information.
This is all red government idiots do on tuner, they sit and wait for wrong information and then try to pass that on as gospel truth.
Men getting make our easy
Ok Redmancarluva wrote:As usual, your logic of "if someone is not with you, they are against you" applies. Not everyone's views are politically charged.zoom rader wrote:Wait nah Redman have double account?De Dragon wrote:carluva wrote:Hahahaha. The first and second paragraph is so much bollocks. But then again...sMASH wrote:This wsnt a chemical problem, it was a mechanical/process problem.
They ahve a whole team of chemists to figure out a vessel blown out.
That team should ahve Comprised mechanical engineers specializing in condition monitoring and process engineers and technicians. And oneeeee chemical person, with experience in petroleum engineering, jsut to verify that the chemicals at that stage of the process were the only things.
They will come to false conclusions, hit u a 6 for 9 recommendations, they budget a pong and crown to retrofit, and resume operations.
Plant Wil start back, and blow out again. And they will patch back restart blow out.
And that will go on and on till the whole plant fix back by patches.
Wax formation is due to low temps. That might be due to end of run catalyst, insufficient instrumentation, or they put a pipe fitter to operate the reactor.
A chemical engineer is not a chemist. A chemical engineer with the MEEI is what is known as a process engineer.
And I can tell you from personal experience that when MEEI and OSH get involved this is treated with utmost gravity and is devoid of governmental interference.
But do continue with the blather.
Red Colostomy Bag, dais you?
Why is it "bollocks" exactly
It seems another red government argent is feed him misleading information.
This is all red government idiots do on tuner, they sit and wait for wrong information and then try to pass that on as gospel truth.
Men getting make our easy
carluva wrote:As usual, your logic of "if someone is not with you, they are against you" applies. Not everyone's views are politically charged.
Joshie23 wrote:carluva wrote:As usual, your logic of "if someone is not with you, they are against you" applies. Not everyone's views are politically charged.
Agreed, 100%. That's why I asked in the Engineers et al Thread for a clean, neutral (political and otherwise) play by play and breakdown as to why we are where we are, and how to fix it.
That "if I criticize 'n', then I must be '1/n' " mentality* is exactly why these political entities have had us by the balls for the past 59 years, sadly.
*Lil math joke there, goodnight Skinner Park.. bah dum tss..
zoom rader wrote:Joshie23 wrote:carluva wrote:As usual, your logic of "if someone is not with you, they are against you" applies. Not everyone's views are politically charged.
Agreed, 100%. That's why I asked in the Engineers et al Thread for a clean, neutral (political and otherwise) play by play and breakdown as to why we are where we are, and how to fix it.
That "if I criticize 'n', then I must be '1/n' " mentality* is exactly why these political entities have had us by the balls for the past 59 years, sadly.
*Lil math joke there, goodnight Skinner Park.. bah dum tss..
You Sir are an idiot
You know very well where we are at that plant and why. I have said it before and so have others who work in the energy industry.
The wrong staff was hired at that plant with ill fitting managers who have ties with the red government. That's the bottom line.
A rushed plant and look where we are today.
Nothing will come out of that local investigation and those chosen are mere stooges for the cover up.
If an international investigation was to conduct then you will find the root cause of problems steming from the top management and work culture behaviour.
That plant needs to be shut down and every aspect checked over and then recommissioned. Shoddy workmanship.
Yk, it would be interesting to see the points/data surrounding ALNG, NGC, Producers, Point Lisa's, etc., laid out from start to finish (as in where we are now) and possible solutions, without the name-calling, vitriol, mudslinging, etc.
I mean, we're following the points and you guys are saying brilliant stuff, but I just think there would be more credibility to each poster of the facts were laid out without any apparent bias or anything like that.
Engineers et al, surely we're capable of something like that, right? Please?
Source: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=278577&start=2490 18th post from the top.
sMASH wrote:no amount of book or lectures in a university hall does TEACH u dat. that is just pure contact hours in the industry, u will get to understand how process plants go.
dem fellas like they never buy an ole car as a first car or project. every ting is either roro or firm.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 198 guests