Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
elec2020 wrote:^ didn't the wedding also find loop holes to frolic? that's my thing. in the middle of a pandemic both did the wrong thing (i doubt the wedding required party guests to come with a certified negative covid result taken over the last 1-2 days). But one gets off scot free and defense by some of the masses as they were able to find a loop hole in the law to get away with it. How can that be right?
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:elec2020 wrote:^ didn't the wedding also find loop holes to frolic? that's my thing. in the middle of a pandemic both did the wrong thing (i doubt the wedding required party guests to come with a certified negative covid result taken over the last 1-2 days). But one gets off scot free and defense by some of the masses as they were able to find a loop hole in the law to get away with it. How can that be right?
This is a case where immoral isn't necessarily illegal.
The CoP seemed to be making this point since the first Covid ordinance was passed that he can only operate within the law. if the law makers do not make it a law, the Police cannot act. Before, when it was not in the law to wear a mask, the Police could only advise citizens, not charge or arrest them. Now that it is a law it is different.
Common sense would tell you not to invite a lot of people to your house, but if you did it would be stupid but not illegal. It's like people congregating outside of a bar, it's stupid but not illegal.
it could be the CoP is showing how the Gov't needs to firm up on how the Covid ordinances and regulations need to be revised.
elec2020 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:elec2020 wrote:^ didn't the wedding also find loop holes to frolic? that's my thing. in the middle of a pandemic both did the wrong thing (i doubt the wedding required party guests to come with a certified negative covid result taken over the last 1-2 days). But one gets off scot free and defense by some of the masses as they were able to find a loop hole in the law to get away with it. How can that be right?
This is a case where immoral isn't necessarily illegal.
The CoP seemed to be making this point since the first Covid ordinance was passed that he can only operate within the law. if the law makers do not make it a law, the Police cannot act. Before, when it was not in the law to wear a mask, the Police could only advise citizens, not charge or arrest them. Now that it is a law it is different.
Common sense would tell you not to invite a lot of people to your house, but if you did it would be stupid but not illegal. It's like people congregating outside of a bar, it's stupid but not illegal.
it could be the CoP is showing how the Gov't needs to firm up on how the Covid ordinances and regulations need to be revised.
I got you. Sigh. I guess it is what it is until laws are changed to make people more accountable. What set me off is that this is the 3rd or 4th instance that one side of society gets away with it while the other side doesn't. But u are right. The ttps can only operate within the scope of the law.
FordeG wrote:I laught at people who are afraid of Covi. It's a man made hoax used to exercise control on the masses.
It is exactly what the powers to be want, they round up the kids having a party but the wedding, or down the islands, or Bayside extravaganzas are left alone.
Wake up sheeple.
FordeG wrote:I laught at people who are afraid of Covi. It's a man made hoax used to exercise control on the masses.
It is exactly what the powers to be want, they round up the kids having a party but the wedding, or down the islands, or Bayside extravaganzas are left alone.
Wake up sheeple.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:elec2020 wrote:^ didn't the wedding also find loop holes to frolic? that's my thing. in the middle of a pandemic both did the wrong thing (i doubt the wedding required party guests to come with a certified negative covid result taken over the last 1-2 days). But one gets off scot free and defense by some of the masses as they were able to find a loop hole in the law to get away with it. How can that be right?
This is a case where immoral isn't necessarily illegal.
The CoP seemed to be making this point since the first Covid ordinance was passed that he can only operate within the law. if the law makers do not make it a law, the Police cannot act. Before, when it was not in the law to wear a mask, the Police could only advise citizens, not charge or arrest them. Now that it is a law it is different.
Common sense would tell you not to invite a lot of people to your house, but if you did it would be stupid but not illegal. It's like people congregating outside of a bar, it's stupid but not illegal.
it could be the CoP is showing how the Gov't needs to firm up on how the Covid ordinances and regulations need to be revised.
Rovin wrote:https://www.facebook.com/100054002451111/videos/884165915662141
pugboy wrote:seems like inside a private property
daring dragoon wrote:Rovin wrote:https://www.facebook.com/100054002451111/videos/884165915662141
they dont do them vene's that when they hold them, they dont do the chinese when they raid the gorcery looking for illegal chinese cigarette ( which they dont) but they want to do that they own trini. it have no place for trini's again in trinidad, one law for we and on law for the non nationals.
Bull5hitMaxPower wrote:daring dragoon wrote:Rovin wrote:https://www.facebook.com/100054002451111/videos/884165915662141
they dont do them vene's that when they hold them, they dont do the chinese when they raid the gorcery looking for illegal chinese cigarette ( which they dont) but they want to do that they own trini. it have no place for trini's again in trinidad, one law for we and on law for the non nationals.
Hello daring dragoon,
A very good observation but you have to understand that the Venes and Chinese that you referenced are generally compliant and law abiding.
If we have groups of Trinis, Venes, Chinese in an establishment, who is more likely to break/disobey the rules/laws, cause trouble, disrespect others and litter the most?
When last have you seen a Chinese national held for crime on the front page?
Bottom line my good man, is that between the groups you singled out, Trinis are more susceptible to having altercations with the law, therefore, there will be a disparity of leniency between the groups in question.
So before the race card jumps out, i can only go with what i observe for myself and what i read in the national newspaper and hear on the news.
Its like Obama and Trump making a false statement. Who is more likely to be criticized? If you get my drift.
Once it's under license I would buy.SMc wrote:@ZR- Would you buy a 3M N95 respirators made in China in a 3M factory or would that be an inferior to you?
pugboy wrote:so where the party is later
stev wrote:did trinis forget Covid is still rampant?
Curepe junction was like carnival on Friday evening....today was madness in south with no social distancing in sight...wtf?
wagonrunner wrote:This is how they do their part
The longer they do this, the longer we are in for it. All the sraff I've sent at hallmark grand bazaar, think this the way it should be worn
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: pugboy and 140 guests