Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
If the red government was serious about crime there would have been a drastic reduction in crime.Habit7 wrote:timelapse wrote:2020 was covid, any dvmbfvck could tell you crime would be reduced by people being at home moreHabit7 wrote:matr1x wrote:Easy to make the numbers lower when you both cooking the books and slicing the data in a skewed manner. Let's not include not data entering it at all.
People like Habit7 love what happen to this girl. Alligators in swamp and Calcutta ship, eh?
So I am celebrating the peer reviewed stats and experiencial fact that crime was lower in 2020. But you are vex with that reality there was not more crime and are making a claim with no evidence because it is a lie.
Then you claim I like a certain crime.
#projection
So wait, is it what matrix said:
"the numbers lower when you both cooking the books and slicing the data in a skewed manner"?
or when you said:
"crime would be reduced by people being at home more"?
or when you said before:
"Hard facts :crime rates go up during PNM administration years"
Because you contradicting yourself and matrix.
I have never seen ppl so upset that crime dropped and it is inhibiting their ability to complain that crime too high.
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:@ Smash re HSF.
Your issue is spending and borrowing and you think unc will do better.
I dont believe either party has a philosophical framework or policy that they can vocalize.
If you cant explain it to a 6 year old- you dont know what you talking about.
So lets agree that planned economic policy does not exist in TnT.
Both parties spend what they can because they think its politically expedient.
Both parties are 150% dependent on energy prices and production levels to dictate what they do on a day to day basis.
The UNC missed the golden opportunity to change for the better the financial position of the country by keeping our spending less than our income. (That despite their campaign being based on everything they did while in power)
Budgets instead grew from the 40B to 64B range matching our income growth-and every year ran a deficit.
in 2010 I suggested fixing our budgets at 75% of last years revenue with a moving average to smoothout the changes-a mechanism that took windfall from oil and gas -and banked it, but still allowed some extra cash to be used prudently.
Now that our earnings since 2014 have been reduced, alongside the major recalibration of the energy sector that were ignored by your UNC....of course we will have a hard and tough environment.
If UNC couldn't run surpluses with oil in the 90s why are you penalising the PNM for the same with oil at 50?
While dealing with the Petrotrins etc.
I disagree with you on the hway- (not at 250M per KM like the Point Sando under your fiscally prudent UNC but properly costed and built)
Opening up South and the East with a hway brings business opportunity ,activity and wealth to all citizens those areas.
Of course our challenge is the properly part on everything.
The HSF fund is at the levels they were in 2015 despite the drawdowns.
That isnt a bad place to be comparatively.
This has to be the singularly most dotish statement on 2NR that you've made in some time, and you have made quite a few.
By your logic, if oil falls to $40, then we're supposed to be hopeless? Did we elect people who could only lead and manage in good times? Real leaders emerge in crises, and so far, JUHN Scarfy, Impsy and the entire LFDRFD PNM isn't cutting it
In other words Kamla fault? Why hasn't the LFDRFD PNM also done those things?
What opportunity a Toco port brings? Who TF driving to Toco, to take a boat to Tobago?
What opportunity closing PT brings when two YEARS later, it cannot be sold, or restarted?
Who issued the 850 M USD bond, and what benefit did it bring to the refinery?
That's ok dumbass..I don't expect you would understand....blather on.
Your usual pantymanish hissy fit when you can't reply to facts. Clueless apologist kant.
nervewrecker wrote:Saddist eh know the speed limit there is 140km/h
If they hit me speed gun I dropping the ticket in the station.
Over the hill on the next end of premier crescent where the road join is like lavantille. House on top house and over drain, between nook and cranny.
Some guy brace me about recording in there saying he from the line, so he badup, hiding from de powleece.
Told him he behind my effin house. Bat in he crease.
See if me eh make a long range pcp gun and shoot all them fowl from a height. Nail for bullet, carcass falling like rain. The hunters will get wood for it.
sMASH wrote:They not fraid to hide they brand any more. FB_IMG_1612966106672.jpegFB_IMG_1612966321440.jpegFB_IMG_1612966343672.jpeg
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:@ Smash re HSF.
Your issue is spending and borrowing and you think unc will do better.
I dont believe either party has a philosophical framework or policy that they can vocalize.
If you cant explain it to a 6 year old- you dont know what you talking about.
So lets agree that planned economic policy does not exist in TnT.
Both parties spend what they can because they think its politically expedient.
Both parties are 150% dependent on energy prices and production levels to dictate what they do on a day to day basis.
The UNC missed the golden opportunity to change for the better the financial position of the country by keeping our spending less than our income. (That despite their campaign being based on everything they did while in power)
Budgets instead grew from the 40B to 64B range matching our income growth-and every year ran a deficit.
in 2010 I suggested fixing our budgets at 75% of last years revenue with a moving average to smoothout the changes-a mechanism that took windfall from oil and gas -and banked it, but still allowed some extra cash to be used prudently.
Now that our earnings since 2014 have been reduced, alongside the major recalibration of the energy sector that were ignored by your UNC....of course we will have a hard and tough environment.
If UNC couldn't run surpluses with oil in the 90s why are you penalising the PNM for the same with oil at 50?
While dealing with the Petrotrins etc.
I disagree with you on the hway- (not at 250M per KM like the Point Sando under your fiscally prudent UNC but properly costed and built)
Opening up South and the East with a hway brings business opportunity ,activity and wealth to all citizens those areas.
Of course our challenge is the properly part on everything.
The HSF fund is at the levels they were in 2015 despite the drawdowns.
That isnt a bad place to be comparatively.
This has to be the singularly most dotish statement on 2NR that you've made in some time, and you have made quite a few.
By your logic, if oil falls to $40, then we're supposed to be hopeless? Did we elect people who could only lead and manage in good times? Real leaders emerge in crises, and so far, JUHN Scarfy, Impsy and the entire LFDRFD PNM isn't cutting it
In other words Kamla fault? Why hasn't the LFDRFD PNM also done those things?
What opportunity a Toco port brings? Who TF driving to Toco, to take a boat to Tobago?
What opportunity closing PT brings when two YEARS later, it cannot be sold, or restarted?
Who issued the 850 M USD bond, and what benefit did it bring to the refinery?
That's ok dumbass..I don't expect you would understand....blather on.
Your usual pantymanish hissy fit when you can't reply to facts. Clueless apologist kant.
Lol
if you still on the same position that you started with...despite all the actual info posted...why waste more time.
Blather on dumbass.
Knock yourself out
Greenday wrote:Now saw the AG commenting on no bail for people hold firearms, what became of his children on the fire arms issue they had ?
Looks like AG is doing damage control
Greenday wrote:Now saw the AG commenting on no bail for people hold firearms, what became of his children on the fire arms issue they had ?
Looks like AG is doing damage control
sMASH wrote:how did he become wrong?
what transpired in his brain between hearing rowley say in parliament that they mottley gave them a portion of their gift from india, to the time the reporter asking to confirm the arrangments of the vaccine, for him to correct the reporter, that india gifted it to the caricom and barbados was the distribution hub?
how does he distill 'distribution hub', out of mottely's pity for us?
Redman wrote:He should have a SM staff to blame like any upstanding leader.
daxt0r wrote:its perfectly understandable to make a grammatical or language error during speaking, not concoct a completely different story to the fact, but then again with PNM we have a typed word document that a child could identify raised in parliament as an email, we also have that PT will not be closed and similar statements over the years.
But is you reddos yuh could a PNM for cold blooded murder so we know better than to expect good sense from u.