Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
He pointed out the increase in fares did not increase profits, but compensated for the loss of a passenger in the midst of a difficult economic climate
The_Honourable wrote:They will increase it, trinidadians will make some noise, then line up on the stand normal.
The_Honourable wrote:They will increase it, trinidadians will make some noise, then line up on the stand normal.
thelem-again wrote:He pointed out the increase in fares did not increase profits, but compensated for the loss of a passenger in the midst of a difficult economic climate
Blasted greed. You losing out on one passenger and want to increase the fare??
And I saw nothing about it being limited to "7 seater vehicles only", therefore fares being raise in normal 4 seaters as well?
I'm not a travelling commuter but this is non-sense. Guess this is what happens when you live in a country without regulatory bodies with "associations/unions that regulate themselves.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:It's a 7 seater
6 passengers and 1 driver
So where was the 8th person sitting?
JA comment tbh. If a manufacturer specifies a certain capacity how is it the fault of any gov't to enforce such. Majority of them got CNG kits free courtesy the same gov't and spending less on fuel. How much income taxes they paying on a yearly basis because we all know that they earning beyond the allowance88sins wrote:thelem-again wrote:He pointed out the increase in fares did not increase profits, but compensated for the loss of a passenger in the midst of a difficult economic climate
Blasted greed. You losing out on one passenger and want to increase the fare??
And I saw nothing about it being limited to "7 seater vehicles only", therefore fares being raise in normal 4 seaters as well?
I'm not a travelling commuter but this is non-sense. Guess this is what happens when you live in a country without regulatory bodies with "associations/unions that regulate themselves.
Correct, but fares have to increase across the board. Because if the increase doesn't apply to 4 seaters so they cheaper to travel wit, all the drivers with the listed vehicles would ketch dey ass to pull a trip. Couple that with the fact that many still paying for their vehicles, and the amount of mileage and wear they put on them working taxi, rapidly depreciating them, if they can't pay their loans and banks repo those vehicles dem drivers would still be on the hook.
But dis is allyuh pee on em guavamint, allyuh vote fuh dat, and allyuh like it so.
maj. tom wrote:... Inertia does stop by magic after the front seat ent? ...
maj. tom wrote:lol so they reducing passengers and raising the fare to compensate, but yet no word of passenger safety like seat-belts for all passengers. Inertia does stop by magic after the front seat ent? What about child seats for baby passengers? As registered taxi drivers, should they all not have a child seat in the trunk to attach to a regular seat for when there is need to buckle up a child? Nothing wrong with paying a passenger fare for that safety service. Trinidad forever have backward sheit laws that never protect its citizens eh?
And they eh talk about how taxi drivers always speeding and zig zagging like Mad Max hog warriors? They culling the traditional jackass taxi driving with this fare raise? If Arrive Alive ever needs proof for their campaign, just follow a POS/Curepe to Sando taxi at any hour with a dashcam.
thelem-again wrote:He pointed out the increase in fares did not increase profits, but compensated for the loss of a passenger in the midst of a difficult economic climate
Blasted greed. You losing out on one passenger and want to increase the fare??
2ndchance wrote:thelem-again wrote:He pointed out the increase in fares did not increase profits, but compensated for the loss of a passenger in the midst of a difficult economic climate
Blasted greed. You losing out on one passenger and want to increase the fare??
Taxi driver maths....
Before fare increase, 7 passengers at $7 each was $49 total.
After increase, 6 passengers at $9 is $54 total.
So the increased fare results in an additional $5 per trip even with 1 less passenger but yet "He pointed out the increase in fares did not increase profits".
I guess if he was being honest, he would admit that they want the passengers to compensate them for not breaking the law as they were doing in the first instance by exceeding the authorized number of passengers.
maj. tom wrote:lol so they reducing passengers and raising the fare to compensate, but yet no word of passenger safety like seat-belts for all passengers. Inertia does stop by magic after the front seat ent? What about child seats for baby passengers? As registered taxi drivers, should they all not have a child seat in the trunk to attach to a regular seat for when there is need to buckle up a child? Nothing wrong with paying a passenger fare for that safety service. Trinidad forever have backward sheit laws that never protect its citizens eh?
And they eh talk about how taxi drivers always speeding and zig zagging like Mad Max hog warriors? They culling the traditional jackass taxi driving with this fare raise? If Arrive Alive ever needs proof for their campaign, just follow a POS/Curepe to Sando taxi at any hour with a dashcam.
I was talking to a LO recently while in the presence of a taxi driver doing inspection. Apparently some vehicles can carry 7 passengers and some can carry six. Some vehicles are actually manufactured with 8 seal belts and 8 headrests and from the pic I see Duane posted, I noticed seat belt buckles for 3 persons at the back and 3 in the middle.hustla_ambition101 wrote:JA comment tbh. If a manufacturer specifies a certain capacity how is it the fault of any gov't to enforce such. Majority of them got CNG kits free courtesy the same gov't and spending less on fuel. How much income taxes they paying on a yearly basis because we all know that they earning beyond the allowance88sins wrote:thelem-again wrote:He pointed out the increase in fares did not increase profits, but compensated for the loss of a passenger in the midst of a difficult economic climate
Blasted greed. You losing out on one passenger and want to increase the fare??
And I saw nothing about it being limited to "7 seater vehicles only", therefore fares being raise in normal 4 seaters as well?
I'm not a travelling commuter but this is non-sense. Guess this is what happens when you live in a country without regulatory bodies with "associations/unions that regulate themselves.
Correct, but fares have to increase across the board. Because if the increase doesn't apply to 4 seaters so they cheaper to travel wit, all the drivers with the listed vehicles would ketch dey ass to pull a trip. Couple that with the fact that many still paying for their vehicles, and the amount of mileage and wear they put on them working taxi, rapidly depreciating them, if they can't pay their loans and banks repo those vehicles dem drivers would still be on the hook.
But dis is allyuh pee on em guavamint, allyuh vote fuh dat, and allyuh like it so.
killercow wrote:Some vehicles are actually manufactured with 8 seal belts and 8 headrests and from the pic I see Duane posted, I noticed seat belt buckles for 3 persons at the back and 3 in the middle.
Not sure what criteria has to be met but I personally felt that if you had to increase the fare, $8 would have been sufficient.
juggernaught wrote:So my question is things only hard for them taxi drivers alone? What horse feces I hearing look how long the working public salaries have never been adjusted to the high cost of living and then these sons of beaches wanna increase the fare because they losing out? Man that’s just greed for real, I nor the traveling public never gone and tell you to buy a frigging Serena or noah
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: adnj, afanofmuselk, Chimera, Dizzy28, Duane 3NE 2NR, Les Bain and 133 guests