TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

Another terrorist attack on London Bridge - Nov 29 2019

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

User avatar
timelapse
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8113
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 7:13 pm

Re: Another terrorist attack on London Bridge - Nov 29 2019

Postby timelapse » February 26th, 2021, 2:32 pm

Rot in hell Jihad Jane.Thank God yuh damn offspring dead.Nobody that evil should be allowed to reproduce

Ben_spanna
punchin NOS
Posts: 3055
Joined: October 28th, 2016, 9:25 am

Re: Another terrorist attack on London Bridge - Nov 29 2019

Postby Ben_spanna » February 26th, 2021, 2:36 pm

Isis is Isis, doesn tmatter if youre mosslin, muslim or Islamic, youre a piece of sh1t and should be disposed of accordingly!

User avatar
MaxPower
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14156
Joined: October 31st, 2010, 2:37 pm

Re: Another terrorist attack on London Bridge - Nov 29 2019

Postby MaxPower » February 26th, 2021, 2:48 pm

The last time i made comments on Mosslims and terrorism i was banned.

K74T
TunerGod
Posts: 21234
Joined: June 7th, 2010, 11:01 pm

Re: Another terrorist attack on London Bridge - Nov 29 2019

Postby K74T » February 26th, 2021, 2:52 pm

Shamima Begone!

User avatar
teems1
punchin NOS
Posts: 3445
Joined: March 15th, 2007, 4:44 pm

Re: Another terrorist attack on London Bridge - Nov 29 2019

Postby teems1 » February 26th, 2021, 3:05 pm

There are 2 issues intertwined here which appears to be obfuscating the general public as to how to approach.

1) Grooming of a young teenager and radicalizing them.
2) Revoke someone's citizenship which may render them stateless.

(1) She was groomed online at 13/14 years old and ran away to Istanbul at 15. She is a victim in this case. If we can protect 13/14 year olds from pedos and pervs, we should be able to do so in this case.

The fact that she appears to show no remorse for her decision even at the age of 20 is besides the point. She is a victim of brainwashing, and thus any statement(s) she make are not a true reflection of her character.

She needs to go through a rehab facility to see the error of her ways and basically deprogram her.

(2) The UK government saw an easy way out seeing that she holds Bangladeshi citizenship, and thus is attempting to remove the UK citizenship to basically make her "someone else's problem".

This sets an unethical precedent, whereby you simply try to get rid of the problem when it suits you.

What about Bangladesh in this case? She was born in the UK and spent her entire life there, why should Bangladesh end up with her?

It ends up basically who can file papers faster?

Everyone loves sheitting on the US, but a facility like Gitmo would have been perfect for holding her.

User avatar
MaxPower
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14156
Joined: October 31st, 2010, 2:37 pm

Re: Another terrorist attack on London Bridge - Nov 29 2019

Postby MaxPower » February 26th, 2021, 3:23 pm

Maybe she should be executed.

User avatar
timelapse
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8113
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 7:13 pm

Re: Another terrorist attack on London Bridge - Nov 29 2019

Postby timelapse » February 26th, 2021, 3:43 pm

Yuh cant deprogram dotish.I had an ex that thought the whole Jihad bride life was exciting.She convert and all that,and try to encourage me.I show her the door.And it was jusso jusso that change in her came.Not even her parents saw it coming
teems1 wrote:There are 2 issues intertwined here which appears to be obfuscating the general public as to how to approach.

1) Grooming of a young teenager and radicalizing them.
2) Revoke someone's citizenship which may render them stateless.

(1) She was groomed online at 13/14 years old and ran away to Istanbul at 15. She is a victim in this case. If we can protect 13/14 year olds from pedos and pervs, we should be able to do so in this case.

The fact that she appears to show no remorse for her decision even at the age of 20 is besides the point. She is a victim of brainwashing, and thus any statement(s) she make are not a true reflection of her character.

She needs to go through a rehab facility to see the error of her ways and basically deprogram her.

(2) The UK government saw an easy way out seeing that she holds Bangladeshi citizenship, and thus is attempting to remove the UK citizenship to basically make her "someone else's problem".

This sets an unethical precedent, whereby you simply try to get rid of the problem when it suits you.

What about Bangladesh in this case? She was born in the UK and spent her entire life there, why should Bangladesh end up with her?

It ends up basically who can file papers faster?

Everyone loves sheitting on the US, but a facility like Gitmo would have been perfect for holding her.

adnj
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10073
Joined: February 24th, 2014, 2:55 pm

Re: Another terrorist attack on London Bridge - Nov 29 2019

Postby adnj » February 26th, 2021, 4:45 pm

teems1 wrote:There are 2 issues intertwined here which appears to be obfuscating the general public as to how to approach.

1) Grooming of a young teenager and radicalizing them.
2) Revoke someone's citizenship which may render them stateless.

(1) She was groomed online at 13/14 years old and ran away to Istanbul at 15. She is a victim in this case. If we can protect 13/14 year olds from pedos and pervs, we should be able to do so in this case.

The fact that she appears to show no remorse for her decision even at the age of 20 is besides the point. She is a victim of brainwashing, and thus any statement(s) she make are not a true reflection of her character.

She needs to go through a rehab facility to see the error of her ways and basically deprogram her.

(2) The UK government saw an easy way out seeing that she holds Bangladeshi citizenship, and thus is attempting to remove the UK citizenship to basically make her "someone else's problem".

This sets an unethical precedent, whereby you simply try to get rid of the problem when it suits you.

What about Bangladesh in this case? She was born in the UK and spent her entire life there, why should Bangladesh end up with her?

It ends up basically who can file papers faster?

Everyone loves sheitting on the US, but a facility like Gitmo would have been perfect for holding her.
She is in a facility that is similar to Cuba's US Naval Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp -- the Al-Roj camp run by the Syrian Democratic Forces in Syria.

User avatar
teems1
punchin NOS
Posts: 3445
Joined: March 15th, 2007, 4:44 pm

Re: Another terrorist attack on London Bridge - Nov 29 2019

Postby teems1 » February 26th, 2021, 5:00 pm

adnj wrote:
teems1 wrote:There are 2 issues intertwined here which appears to be obfuscating the general public as to how to approach.

1) Grooming of a young teenager and radicalizing them.
2) Revoke someone's citizenship which may render them stateless.

(1) She was groomed online at 13/14 years old and ran away to Istanbul at 15. She is a victim in this case. If we can protect 13/14 year olds from pedos and pervs, we should be able to do so in this case.

The fact that she appears to show no remorse for her decision even at the age of 20 is besides the point. She is a victim of brainwashing, and thus any statement(s) she make are not a true reflection of her character.

She needs to go through a rehab facility to see the error of her ways and basically deprogram her.

(2) The UK government saw an easy way out seeing that she holds Bangladeshi citizenship, and thus is attempting to remove the UK citizenship to basically make her "someone else's problem".

This sets an unethical precedent, whereby you simply try to get rid of the problem when it suits you.

What about Bangladesh in this case? She was born in the UK and spent her entire life there, why should Bangladesh end up with her?

It ends up basically who can file papers faster?

Everyone loves sheitting on the US, but a facility like Gitmo would have been perfect for holding her.
She is in a facility that is similar to Cuba's US Naval Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp -- the Al-Roj camp run by the Syrian Democratic Forces in Syria.


Shamima is probably few tents away from other destroyed families whom Shamima's Dutch radical husband probably killed.

That's nowhere near the same as Gitmo where they only keep terrorists.

adnj
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10073
Joined: February 24th, 2014, 2:55 pm

Re: Another terrorist attack on London Bridge - Nov 29 2019

Postby adnj » February 26th, 2021, 5:57 pm

teems1 wrote:
adnj wrote:
teems1 wrote:There are 2 issues intertwined here which appears to be obfuscating the general public as to how to approach.

1) Grooming of a young teenager and radicalizing them.
2) Revoke someone's citizenship which may render them stateless.

(1) She was groomed online at 13/14 years old and ran away to Istanbul at 15. She is a victim in this case. If we can protect 13/14 year olds from pedos and pervs, we should be able to do so in this case.

The fact that she appears to show no remorse for her decision even at the age of 20 is besides the point. She is a victim of brainwashing, and thus any statement(s) she make are not a true reflection of her character.

She needs to go through a rehab facility to see the error of her ways and basically deprogram her.

(2) The UK government saw an easy way out seeing that she holds Bangladeshi citizenship, and thus is attempting to remove the UK citizenship to basically make her "someone else's problem".

This sets an unethical precedent, whereby you simply try to get rid of the problem when it suits you.

What about Bangladesh in this case? She was born in the UK and spent her entire life there, why should Bangladesh end up with her?

It ends up basically who can file papers faster?

Everyone loves sheitting on the US, but a facility like Gitmo would have been perfect for holding her.
She is in a facility that is similar to Cuba's US Naval Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp -- the Al-Roj camp run by the Syrian Democratic Forces in Syria.


Shamima is probably few tents away from other destroyed families whom Shamima's Dutch radical husband probably killed.

That's nowhere near the same as Gitmo where they only keep terrorists.


Your point is moot. Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp only held detainees deemed high-value terrorism suspects by the US government.

Otherwise, you're just trolling.

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 82 guests