Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
MaxPower wrote:Hello elec2020/goalpost,
I am respectfully disagreeing with you both as it is not convincing.
Why would the “handcuffed man” make those comments about Morris?
Did Morris know serial rapist Devon Charles aka Rooster teeth personally?
What is his relation with the other two murderers/rapists who are unfortunately alive?
Breds
Them fellas could have been guilty as sin....we as a country cannot sanction TtPS killing suspects as they did.
It satisfying on a base emotional level...the SUSPECTS have the same rights as you or I.
We need a full investigation and yes by foreign investigators into the whole matter...why she was killed, etc.Soup to nuts
Imho this is a election issue .
daxt0r wrote:is like the scrap iron man dem, when you come with a load of tstt phone line till smoldering cuz yuh bon it out in a back road you feel dem ent taking it? all ah dem is criminal one way or d nex.
MaxPower wrote:I am in full support of the hangman and the chair.
Innocent until proven guilty just doesn’t cut it.
Allyuh telling me a serial rapist with over 70 offenses who hasnt been convicted is still to be referred as a “suspect”?.....steups.
You think a law abiding citizen could just end up in a chair wrongfully and beaten to a pulp? What are the odds? 99.9 % of them who are interrogated are either guilty or put themselves in that position.
The majority of the country is rejoicing regardless of what these criminal protecting lawyers say.
My NO sympathy stance remains the same.
Allyuh too lenient and want everything to be “fair” and being “fair” in many cases prevents many from getting what they deserve.
Nothing aint fair.
I say again, what are the odds of an innocent man being put on the chair? Once you obey the law and be VERY cautious of your surroundings and who you deal with you have nothing to worry about.
Rovin wrote:ole saying : those who live in glass house shud not throw stones
gary ask somebody if what he daddy did was right .... read d comments
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=357 ... 4324230630
Ryan197912 wrote:He fighting with auntie Kamla now...who next???
Judge to cops: You must destroy info on freed man
Rickie Ramdass Feb 19, 2021 Updated 6 hrs ago
Margaret
Justice Margaret Mohammed
IT is unconstitutional and illegal for the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service (TTPS) to retain a person’s photographs and other information in its database if that individual was charged with a criminal offence but later acquitted.
In making that declaration yesterday, a High Court judge directed Police Commissioner Gary Griffith to immediately destroy the information belonging to a man who challenged the section of law that allowed for the retention of the information.
Making the ruling was Justice Margaret Mohammed who was to determine the constitutionality of Section 50(2) of the Police Service Act.
In 2014, Parliament amended section 50 of the Act and effectively empowered the TTPS to take and retain the measurements, photographs and fingerprint information of certain persons.
No specified time was stated for the retention of the measurements and photographs, but specified times were stated for the retention of the fingerprint data.
The amended section states: “Where the measurement or photograph taken under subsection (1) is of a person who has not previously been convicted of a criminal offence and such person is discharged or acquitted by a court, all records relating to the measurement or photograph shall be kept by the Commissioner.
The claim was brought by Keston Felix who was charged in May 2017 with using insulting language to the annoyance of persons and resisting arrest.
After being arrested, he was taken to the Morvant Police Station where he was photographed and his fingerprint impressions taken. He was also asked to provide certain personal information such as his address, place of work and family ties which were recorded.
Two years later, the charges were dismissed but in spite of this, Felix said he was informed by his attorneys that the amendment to the Act allowed the TTPS to retain all of his information since the Police Commissioner had no discretion to destroy it.
He therefore filed the claim contending that the amendment infringed on his constitutional right to a private life.
redmanjp wrote:so now the police will have less information to work with- why not allow them to store it for at least 5 years before destroying it? so if someone got acquitted due to insufficient evidence but actually did the crime, you now have to erase all his information. information & intelligence are key to crime detection - more crime will follow.
MaxPower wrote:I really dont understand why we can’t just go along with a guy simply falling off a chair to his death.
Why is that so hard to believe.
Its not like they beat his rapist ass to death and they all sticking to the chair story..
redmanjp wrote:MaxPower wrote:I really dont understand why we can’t just go along with a guy simply falling off a chair to his death.
Why is that so hard to believe.
Its not like they beat his rapist ass to death and they all sticking to the chair story..
because without evidence my friend u would be just pickup any man on the street that look like a robber/rapist and they are falling off chairs- or u would have to release him for lack of evidence
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 88 guests