Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
GVTrini07 wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:GVTrini07 wrote:Protest Yes! Making it an inconvenient situation for
1 persons who cannot assist with you plight
2 Have nothing to do with the situation
3.Blocking freedom of access egress of ordinary citizens
Is wrong and should be dealt with accordingly.
When they blocking people who just trying tuh go about they own business and bawling sue sue sue, that was not aggression?
I will say Protest Yes, but don’t have innocents affected! Cause it goes the other way as well!
Then what do you suggest? They already held the protest at the absolute most considerate time of the school week, burned no tyres and werent violent.
Protest Yes! But when you cause inconvience to others who are not part of the problem or soloution, do you expect them to sympathize with your cause? I am not suggesting anything! They are big people and should be expected to conduct themselves in a manner befitting such, not follow big people with 2 year old mentality.
Years ago, a school principal used to say, we have a lot of followers and not true leaders. All it takes is 1 jackarse to start something and the rest does follow.
Does burning tires is in your belief garners sympathy to your cause? Only those who thinks like those who burning the tires.
Does distressing innocent ganners sympathy to your cause? Only if you think like them!
So just because we feel we are not being heard or not getting what is needed (be it right or wrong), it gives us the authority or right or what ever you want to call it, to distress others who are not involved! I hear all yuh!
kstt wrote:FB_IMG_1540053153025.jpg
Real criminal!
ProtonPowder wrote:GVTrini07 wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:GVTrini07 wrote:Protest Yes! Making it an inconvenient situation for
1 persons who cannot assist with you plight
2 Have nothing to do with the situation
3.Blocking freedom of access egress of ordinary citizens
Is wrong and should be dealt with accordingly.
When they blocking people who just trying tuh go about they own business and bawling sue sue sue, that was not aggression?
I will say Protest Yes, but don’t have innocents affected! Cause it goes the other way as well!
Then what do you suggest? They already held the protest at the absolute most considerate time of the school week, burned no tyres and werent violent.
Protest Yes! But when you cause inconvience to others who are not part of the problem or soloution, do you expect them to sympathize with your cause? I am not suggesting anything! They are big people and should be expected to conduct themselves in a manner befitting such, not follow big people with 2 year old mentality.
Years ago, a school principal used to say, we have a lot of followers and not true leaders. All it takes is 1 jackarse to start something and the rest does follow.
Does burning tires is in your belief garners sympathy to your cause? Only those who thinks like those who burning the tires.
Does distressing innocent ganners sympathy to your cause? Only if you think like them!
So just because we feel we are not being heard or not getting what is needed (be it right or wrong), it gives us the authority or right or what ever you want to call it, to distress others who are not involved! I hear all yuh!
That school principal would identify you as a follower then, you have no suggestion because there is no possible way that it could have been more milquetoast as a protest. What do you want, them sitting in the greens holding hands and singing nursery rhymes?
And is naysayers like you in the public who would come after and say that these chirren dont know how to draw attention to their cause and leading insufficient action. You know that same nonsense people talking about, where people in Germany abandon their vehicles on the road after gas raise? I guess you think that affected no one then.
For action to have results, it must have an effect on those you are protesting against, you clearly do not understand it.
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:[instagram][/instagram]kstt wrote:FB_IMG_1540053153025.jpg
Real criminal!
When beethamites was blocking the road...nobody din get that treatment
ProtonPowder wrote:GVTrini07 wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:GVTrini07 wrote:Protest Yes! Making it an inconvenient situation for
1 persons who cannot assist with you plight
2 Have nothing to do with the situation
3.Blocking freedom of access egress of ordinary citizens
Is wrong and should be dealt with accordingly.
When they blocking people who just trying tuh go about they own business and bawling sue sue sue, that was not aggression?
I will say Protest Yes, but don’t have innocents affected! Cause it goes the other way as well!
Then what do you suggest? They already held the protest at the absolute most considerate time of the school week, burned no tyres and werent violent.
Protest Yes! But when you cause inconvience to others who are not part of the problem or soloution, do you expect them to sympathize with your cause? I am not suggesting anything! They are big people and should be expected to conduct themselves in a manner befitting such, not follow big people with 2 year old mentality.
Years ago, a school principal used to say, we have a lot of followers and not true leaders. All it takes is 1 jackarse to start something and the rest does follow.
Does burning tires is in your belief garners sympathy to your cause? Only those who thinks like those who burning the tires.
Does distressing innocent ganners sympathy to your cause? Only if you think like them!
So just because we feel we are not being heard or not getting what is needed (be it right or wrong), it gives us the authority or right or what ever you want to call it, to distress others who are not involved! I hear all yuh!
That school principal would identify you as a follower then, you have no suggestion because there is no possible way that it could have been more milquetoast as a protest. What do you want, them sitting in the greens holding hands and singing nursery rhymes?
And is naysayers like you in the public who would come after and say that these chirren dont know how to draw attention to their cause and leading insufficient action. You know that same nonsense people talking about, where people in Germany abandon their vehicles on the road after gas raise? I guess you think that affected no one then.
For action to have results, it must have an effect on those you are protesting against, you clearly do not understand it.
bluefete wrote:The last thing any government wants is young people protesting, especially university students, because they are the ones who start revolutions, social and otherwise.
kstt: Very good question.
Miktay wrote:UWI and university campus’ in general have always been hotbeds of protests. That said students should be able to protest but do so within the confines of the law.
Everybody needs to understand that...
Jostiss iza hellofating...
ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:UWI and university campus’ in general have always been hotbeds of protests. That said students should be able to protest but do so within the confines of the law.
Everybody needs to understand that...
Jostiss iza hellofating...
Once you understand that the law enforcement officers trumping up charges against the boys for no other reason than that they can.
Keep parroting what GG saying though, acting as if officers abusing their power isnt a thing.
Miktay wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:UWI and university campus’ in general have always been hotbeds of protests. That said students should be able to protest but do so within the confines of the law.
Everybody needs to understand that...
Jostiss iza hellofating...
Once you understand that the law enforcement officers trumping up charges against the boys for no other reason than that they can.
Keep parroting what GG saying though, acting as if officers abusing their power isnt a thing.
Wrong against wrong doh wuk pardner.
That strategy will only get u into more trouble.
Ppl need to grow up and realize that.
ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:UWI and university campus’ in general have always been hotbeds of protests. That said students should be able to protest but do so within the confines of the law.
Everybody needs to understand that...
Jostiss iza hellofating...
Once you understand that the law enforcement officers trumping up charges against the boys for no other reason than that they can.
Keep parroting what GG saying though, acting as if officers abusing their power isnt a thing.
Wrong against wrong doh wuk pardner.
That strategy will only get u into more trouble.
Ppl need to grow up and realize that.
That is a real house slave mentality. It was a peaceful protest. These hardback officers, like many older adults, despise UWI students and want to beat them down and teach them a lesson.
What is there to grow up and realize? How could the protest have been more peaceful and hold some semblance of effectiveness? Is protesting legally or morally wrong? The 'confines of the law' statement is the broadest catch all statement that only served as a stall in the court of public opinion while they scrambled to charge the boys with a crime.
ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:UWI and university campus’ in general have always been hotbeds of protests. That said students should be able to protest but do so within the confines of the law.
Everybody needs to understand that...
Jostiss iza hellofating...
Once you understand that the law enforcement officers trumping up charges against the boys for no other reason than that they can.
Keep parroting what GG saying though, acting as if officers abusing their power isnt a thing.
Wrong against wrong doh wuk pardner.
That strategy will only get u into more trouble.
Ppl need to grow up and realize that.
That is a real house slave mentality. It was a peaceful protest. These hardback officers, like many older adults, despise UWI students and want to beat them down and teach them a lesson.
What is there to grow up and realize? How could the protest have been more peaceful and hold some semblance of effectiveness? Is protesting legally or morally wrong? The 'confines of the law' statement is the broadest catch all statement that only served as a stall in the court of public opinion while they scrambled to charge the boys with a crime.
GVTrini07 wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:UWI and university campus’ in general have always been hotbeds of protests. That said students should be able to protest but do so within the confines of the law.
Everybody needs to understand that...
Jostiss iza hellofating...
Once you understand that the law enforcement officers trumping up charges against the boys for no other reason than that they can.
Keep parroting what GG saying though, acting as if officers abusing their power isnt a thing.
Wrong against wrong doh wuk pardner.
That strategy will only get u into more trouble.
Ppl need to grow up and realize that.
That is a real house slave mentality. It was a peaceful protest. These hardback officers, like many older adults, despise UWI students and want to beat them down and teach them a lesson.
What is there to grow up and realize? How could the protest have been more peaceful and hold some semblance of effectiveness? Is protesting legally or morally wrong? The 'confines of the law' statement is the broadest catch all statement that only served as a stall in the court of public opinion while they scrambled to charge the boys with a crime.
Ah right pronton bai! Take win, you go protest... Go bai! Doh leh we stop yuh!
Miktay wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:UWI and university campus’ in general have always been hotbeds of protests. That said students should be able to protest but do so within the confines of the law.
Everybody needs to understand that...
Jostiss iza hellofating...
Once you understand that the law enforcement officers trumping up charges against the boys for no other reason than that they can.
Keep parroting what GG saying though, acting as if officers abusing their power isnt a thing.
Wrong against wrong doh wuk pardner.
That strategy will only get u into more trouble.
Ppl need to grow up and realize that.
That is a real house slave mentality. It was a peaceful protest. These hardback officers, like many older adults, despise UWI students and want to beat them down and teach them a lesson.
What is there to grow up and realize? How could the protest have been more peaceful and hold some semblance of effectiveness? Is protesting legally or morally wrong? The 'confines of the law' statement is the broadest catch all statement that only served as a stall in the court of public opinion while they scrambled to charge the boys with a crime.
You cannot block access to public thoroughfares horsie. That iz against the law.
The law may be an ass...but that kinda juvenile liberal behavior only turns public opinion against your cause and weakens your argument.
ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:UWI and university campus’ in general have always been hotbeds of protests. That said students should be able to protest but do so within the confines of the law.
Everybody needs to understand that...
Jostiss iza hellofating...
Once you understand that the law enforcement officers trumping up charges against the boys for no other reason than that they can.
Keep parroting what GG saying though, acting as if officers abusing their power isnt a thing.
Wrong against wrong doh wuk pardner.
That strategy will only get u into more trouble.
Ppl need to grow up and realize that.
That is a real house slave mentality. It was a peaceful protest. These hardback officers, like many older adults, despise UWI students and want to beat them down and teach them a lesson.
What is there to grow up and realize? How could the protest have been more peaceful and hold some semblance of effectiveness? Is protesting legally or morally wrong? The 'confines of the law' statement is the broadest catch all statement that only served as a stall in the court of public opinion while they scrambled to charge the boys with a crime.
You cannot block access to public thoroughfares horsie. That iz against the law.
The law may be an ass...but that kinda juvenile liberal behavior only turns public opinion against your cause and weakens your argument.
Really now? Check saturday's express where they ask the public's opinion on student safety. You'd see what 10/10 of the responses state. I also see the MP for that area representing the students in court.
And on top of that, I see UWI admitting that a sexual assault did take place, backtracking from their previous stance and a committment to improving safety on campus.
Looks like your blind conformity fails you.
Miktay wrote:And your juvenile social justice tactics betray u....
Carry on...
ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:And your juvenile social justice tactics betray u....
Carry on...
Gonna explain your rationale? Or you gonna huff your own farts some more?
Miktay wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:And your juvenile social justice tactics betray u....
Carry on...
Gonna explain your rationale? Or you gonna huff your own farts some more?
U proved my point with ur last statement.
Gonna explain your rationale? Or you gonna huff your own farts some more?
What Rosa parks did was against the lawMiktay wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:UWI and university campus’ in general have always been hotbeds of protests. That said students should be able to protest but do so within the confines of the law.
Everybody needs to understand that...
Jostiss iza hellofating...
Once you understand that the law enforcement officers trumping up charges against the boys for no other reason than that they can.
Keep parroting what GG saying though, acting as if officers abusing their power isnt a thing.
Wrong against wrong doh wuk pardner.
That strategy will only get u into more trouble.
Ppl need to grow up and realize that.
That is a real house slave mentality. It was a peaceful protest. These hardback officers, like many older adults, despise UWI students and want to beat them down and teach them a lesson.
What is there to grow up and realize? How could the protest have been more peaceful and hold some semblance of effectiveness? Is protesting legally or morally wrong? The 'confines of the law' statement is the broadest catch all statement that only served as a stall in the court of public opinion while they scrambled to charge the boys with a crime.
You cannot block access to public thoroughfares horsie. That iz against the law.
The law may be an ass...but that kinda juvenile liberal behavior only turns public opinion against your cause and weakens your argument.
sMASH wrote:What Rosa parks did was against the lawMiktay wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Miktay wrote:UWI and university campus’ in general have always been hotbeds of protests. That said students should be able to protest but do so within the confines of the law.
Everybody needs to understand that...
Jostiss iza hellofating...
Once you understand that the law enforcement officers trumping up charges against the boys for no other reason than that they can.
Keep parroting what GG saying though, acting as if officers abusing their power isnt a thing.
Wrong against wrong doh wuk pardner.
That strategy will only get u into more trouble.
Ppl need to grow up and realize that.
That is a real house slave mentality. It was a peaceful protest. These hardback officers, like many older adults, despise UWI students and want to beat them down and teach them a lesson.
What is there to grow up and realize? How could the protest have been more peaceful and hold some semblance of effectiveness? Is protesting legally or morally wrong? The 'confines of the law' statement is the broadest catch all statement that only served as a stall in the court of public opinion while they scrambled to charge the boys with a crime.
You cannot block access to public thoroughfares horsie. That iz against the law.
The law may be an ass...but that kinda juvenile liberal behavior only turns public opinion against your cause and weakens your argument.
What Harriet tubman did was against the law.
Weed was against the law.
Laws can be changed to suit any agenda. Laws can be bad.
sMASH wrote:So, u wanted them to fight and then u would consider their action legitimate?
ProtonPowder wrote:Seems like Miktay enjoys sitting in a corner admiring his own intellect as bestowed on to him by skeptic youtubers and Ben Shapiro compilations. These students were charged with disorderly conduct, which is as open and vague as any bootlicking individual wants it to be. It was as simple as the officers not liking the students' protest, and it being to their personal distaste.
Just as it is to Miktay's distaste. The students' actions are simultaneously too much and not enough for him. Only the milestone protests and civil actions of the past century are to be used as benchmarks of inequity in society, and anything not matching up is deemed to be 'social justice' and 'liberal' to be used in an insulting sense, a reference to american safe space campus culture in blue states.
Take your nonsense and go Miktay, it is clear that you spend too much time on the internet.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 105 guests