Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Don't see nutting wrong if this real .maj. tom wrote:oh yes, the stench marinating now. There is a 3rd recording. I haven't heard it yet.The Express understands the doctor runs a medical facility in San Fernando.
In one recording, released on social media on Wednesday, a man said to be the doctor, is heard telling an employee to ask people applying to become nurses at the facility to include a photograph, as “a lot of people don’t want negro nurses dealing with them”.
“A lot of patients racial so we prefer an Indian nurse,” the man is heard saying.
“I just have to do what’s best for my business. It’s a vibes I does get. So just tell all of them applicants to send a photo ID please,” he said.
https://trinidadexpress.com/news/local/probe-racist-doctor/article_106e949a-1fcd-11eb-a57b-67e734a8ecf5.html
How the hell this man practising medicine? How he watches himself in the mirror everyday after taking that oath?
Ben_spanna wrote:So in cases like these, who has more rights? just curious, the person who is speaking and has the right to his privacy and the right to not be recorded or the person who is recording and releasing video and audio without consent?
The facts are needed , we can't believe any of these red Goverment supporters/actors.mero wrote:"All Indians are innocent even when they are guilty, fck dPNM! " -Zoomindranath Raiderpersad Rajbissessar
If you paying money you have a right to whom you want attending to you .maj. tom wrote:You don't see a problem because your racial bias is not letting you see how wrong this is. Nobody going to argue with you on why this behaviour is wrong because everyone is tired in 2020 of this. There are many who agree with you though. You're doing the same thing, behaving the same way that you claim the other side does without being able to take a step back and see that it's wrong as well. Your logic is "if the other side does it, so can we." Two wrongs always make a right in Trinidad.
In medicine especially, there is not supposed to be any discrimination based on anything. Every patient is equal and deserves the same rights and best treatment. Doctors and patients are not supposed to have any racial or otherwise identity when it comes to privacy or treatment. The patient does have a right who they want dealing with them within a medical institution by refusing treatment and leaving. They don't have a right in preferring a certain race to attend to them, nor the other way around. A doctor takes a binding oath to his/her professional to uphold such principles.
Bro here in red country land all rumours are true without edvedence.De Dragon wrote:Late 2020 and people still trying to reason with zr?
You give up?elec2020 wrote:^ i give up. I realize its a lost cause. Sure even his coffin/tombstone would lay out some derogatory statement or curse to the PNM
Nah my Doc is Chamely, he a kinda white boy Doc in San Dorollingstock wrote:Plot twist.
That's zoom personal dr. And he's the patient that don't want an african in the office.
He's uncomfortable around africans because he suffer from micro-penis
Ben_spanna wrote:So in cases like these, who has more rights? just curious, the person who is speaking and has the right to his privacy and the right to not be recorded or the person who is recording and releasing video and audio without consent?
It is the red Goverment attempts to mis direct the public once again to build another useless race issue .Rovin wrote:is how express put this story on their front page today
is this d most important issue, slow news day, pnm or unc eh doing nutten wrong today , not even d usa elections more important ????
u does wonder about d media sometime ....
Yup we all know that red Goverment supporters don't have any critical thoughts.paid_influencer wrote:everybody have something to sell. Express does sell papers, and race talk is good for selling papers. PNM Women's league out front, because racial indians extremely good for securing PNM votes. PNM wants their voters to hear more stories about racial indians victimizing black people (since forever they pushing that line). Put the focus on race, so no critical review is put on the non-performance of the government and the general shithole conditions we are living in.
maj. tom wrote:You don't see a problem because your racial bias is not letting you see how wrong this is. Nobody going to argue with you on why this behaviour is wrong because everyone is tired in 2020 of this. There are many who agree with you though. You're doing the same thing, behaving the same way that you claim the other side does without being able to take a step back and see that it's wrong as well. Your logic is "if the other side does it, so can we." Two wrongs always make a right in Trinidad.
In medicine especially, there is not supposed to be any discrimination based on anything. Every patient is equal and deserves the same rights and best treatment. Doctors and patients are not supposed to have any racial or otherwise identity when it comes to privacy or treatment. The patient does have a right who they want dealing with them within a medical institution by refusing treatment and leaving. They don't have a right in preferring a certain race to attend to them, nor the other way around. You can't hire someone based on race because that's what people prefer. That's discrimination. Hiring must take place on qualifications and competence, not race or gender. A doctor takes a binding oath to his/her profession to uphold such principles.
All doctors sell sick leave.rebound wrote:Is this the doctor who "sells sick leave" to anyone in Marabella?
rebound wrote:Is this the doctor who "sells sick leave" to anyone in Marabella?
Kenjo wrote:I think the whole take home concept behind this entire thing is that the doctor shouldn’t be biased against clients ?
A patient could choose whoever they want to treat them ... that’s their choice . The health care worker is the one who has the oath . Regular jobs you won’t understand that concept of ethics and the like because it’s just about money . And some doctors do cross those ethical lines and the profession no matter all the people who probably couldn’t apply for it should hold itself to a standard . People have inherent biases but he got caught out although nothing may come of it
Ben_spanna wrote:So in cases like these, who has more rights? just curious, the person who is speaking and has the right to his privacy and the right to not be recorded or the person who is recording and releasing video and audio without consent?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot], VexXx Dogg and 102 guests