Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
hydroep wrote:We have a mathematical chance of making it. We need to win our remaining two matches and hope that the teams at the top of the table falter.
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:hydroep wrote:We have a mathematical chance of making it. We need to win our remaining two matches and hope that the teams at the top of the table falter.
C.S.k would be another very interesting game,you think they should try and experiment with Perkins or Emrit for these games??
hydroep wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:hydroep wrote:We have a mathematical chance of making it. We need to win our remaining two matches and hope that the teams at the top of the table falter.
C.S.k would be another very interesting game,you think they should try and experiment with Perkins or Emrit for these games??
It depends on what the thinking is. If management has thrown in the towel, they could experiment with whomever they want.
If they're still hoping to qualify, I'd stick with the present formula, simply because we've played well for the majority of both matches thus far with it. We've only lost (IMO) because of questionable tactics at the end.
If you look at this match our spinners took more wickets and had better economy on average. After Ravi was slaughtered in over #20, perhaps it would've made sense to go with one of the those fellas instead. Even Cooper who only took one wicket and was the best of the bowlers in terms of economy may have been a better choice.
One thing's for certain, it's very unlikely we'll qualify from here.
hydroep wrote:^Agreed, but more than him, I blame the tacticians for putting him to bowl that super over.
It was clear from over #20 that he was in difficulty...bowling the same way over and over but expecting a different result.
That should have been a clue to Ganga and others to try someone else.
At the end of the day, we are Trinbagonians and rest assured if they had used someone else and that person had gotten slapped all over the field we would be here debating why they didn't give Rampaul another chance...
hydroep wrote:^Agreed, but more than him, I blame the tacticians for putting him to bowl that super over.
It was clear from over #20 that he was in difficulty...bowling the same way over and over but expecting a different result.
That should have been a clue to Ganga and others to try someone else.
At the end of the day, we are Trinbagonians and rest assured if they had used someone else and that person had gotten slapped all over the field we would be here debating why they didn't give Rampaul another chance...
Dizzy28 wrote:So Pollard just helped himself to 58 from 37 balls with 6 4s and 3 6s. Trinidad and Tobago are a bit poorer without him and Bravo, who showed his worth yesterday but still we put up some competitive showings thus far.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 174 guests