Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Dohplaydat wrote:pugboy wrote:i thought the law does not allow for police to enforce what goes on behind private walls
i know ttps will be selective who they bully thoughwtf wrote:YesDohplaydat wrote:Are weddings on private residences restricted to 10 people?
Asking because a friend is getting married in 2 weeks, big Hindu thing, all 3 nights. And he ain't cancelling the wedding because he say it being held on their private property.
I was like bruh, you think that's a good idea? He say he doh care about covid.....the man is a usually a good soldier, but this is level irresponsibility.
drchaos wrote:Yall really discussing if the state should have the right to enter your property and tell you what you can and cannot do on your own god damn property?
WTF is this ... Stasi country?
Slippery AF slope we on here boys and girls.
Whats next? GG busting down your bedroom door to arrest you for bullin yuh wifee cause it have a pandemic from a new chlamydia strain that a man in china start from screwing a bat?
daring dragoon wrote:padna could invite 1000 people, even the PM he can invite but it up to the people he invited to be dotish enough to go. one clown shouldnt dictate the pace off others. see about your own personal well being. you hear 50000 persons went tobago and get covid and it still had persons that went after easter for vacation. i does wonder if people does wake up in the morning and ask themselves " what dotish thing i can do today" ? or "how i can continue to be dotish on purpose"
drchaos wrote:daring dragoon wrote:padna could invite 1000 people, even the PM he can invite but it up to the people he invited to be dotish enough to go. one clown shouldnt dictate the pace off others. see about your own personal well being. you hear 50000 persons went tobago and get covid and it still had persons that went after easter for vacation. i does wonder if people does wake up in the morning and ask themselves " what dotish thing i can do today" ? or "how i can continue to be dotish on purpose"
Seems like the whole world being "irresponsible"
Globally cases are surging, so this is not a Trini problem, is more of a human issue.
Interesting in T&T, when there are surges we blame irresponsible people not the government.
Rest of the world when there are surges we blame governments.
drchaos wrote:daring dragoon wrote:padna could invite 1000 people, even the PM he can invite but it up to the people he invited to be dotish enough to go. one clown shouldnt dictate the pace off others. see about your own personal well being. you hear 50000 persons went tobago and get covid and it still had persons that went after easter for vacation. i does wonder if people does wake up in the morning and ask themselves " what dotish thing i can do today" ? or "how i can continue to be dotish on purpose"
Seems like the whole world being "irresponsible"
Globally cases are surging, so this is not a Trini problem, is more of a human issue.
Interesting in T&T, when there are surges we blame irresponsible people not the government.
Rest of the world when there are surges we blame governments.
Im 100 percent every country says that to.MaxPower wrote:drchaos wrote:daring dragoon wrote:padna could invite 1000 people, even the PM he can invite but it up to the people he invited to be dotish enough to go. one clown shouldnt dictate the pace off others. see about your own personal well being. you hear 50000 persons went tobago and get covid and it still had persons that went after easter for vacation. i does wonder if people does wake up in the morning and ask themselves " what dotish thing i can do today" ? or "how i can continue to be dotish on purpose"
Seems like the whole world being "irresponsible"
Globally cases are surging, so this is not a Trini problem, is more of a human issue.
Interesting in T&T, when there are surges we blame irresponsible people not the government.
Rest of the world when there are surges we blame governments.
You can’t compare Trinis with the rest of the world bro.
We are a special kinda people
wtf wrote:You could have a wedding any size just make sure it ain't reach social media.
Also when variant start spreading in your wedding dont get vex. You facilitated it.
Yea that also. Guy is irresponsible to be honest. He asking for a visit from TTPS.De Dragon wrote:wtf wrote:You could have a wedding any size just make sure it ain't reach social media.
Also when variant start spreading in your wedding dont get vex. You facilitated it.
The problem is when your large wedding party goes out into society and spreads it.
Skanky wrote:For those who say things like 'my head too hard for mats' let me help you. Decisions are made based on data, numbers and what you know and shouldn't be made on emotions and what the news says.
So let's deal with Trinidad, facts and what we know about this 'deadly' disease in TRINIDAD as of 29th April.
163deaths/10170cases*100=1.603 death rate.
So for every 100 people contracting the Vid 1.603 STATISTICALLY should die.
If we assume a population of 1.5M people then STATISTICALLY around 24045 people should die if every single person in Trinidad contracts Covid.
So we have a situation where 1475955 people are suffering because 24045 people may die but in reality only 163 have died.
1.5M people minus 1% suffering because 163 have died.
In one year we average around 400 deaths from crime but none of you do do anything meaningful about it besides complain on the internet.
In over a year 163 people have died from a Virus but you ok with taking these drastic lockdown measures?
What facts exactly are you people basing your decisions on? Truly I would love to know.
Skanky wrote:For those who say things like 'my head too hard for mats' let me help you. Decisions are made based on data, numbers and what you know and shouldn't be made on emotions and what the news says.
So let's deal with Trinidad, facts and what we know about this 'deadly' disease in TRINIDAD as of 29th April.
163deaths/10170cases*100=1.603 death rate.
So for every 100 people contracting the Vid 1.603 STATISTICALLY should die.
If we assume a population of 1.5M people then STATISTICALLY around 24045 people should die if every single person in Trinidad contracts Covid.
So we have a situation where 1475955 people are suffering because 24045 people may die but in reality only 163 have died.
1.5M people minus 1% suffering because 163 have died.
In one year we average around 400 deaths from crime but none of you do do anything meaningful about it besides complain on the internet.
In over a year 163 people have died from a Virus but you ok with taking these drastic lockdown measures?
What facts exactly are you people basing your decisions on? Truly I would love to know.
Skanky wrote:For those who say things like 'my head too hard for mats' let me help you. Decisions are made based on data, numbers and what you know and shouldn't be made on emotions and what the news says.
So let's deal with Trinidad, facts and what we know about this 'deadly' disease in TRINIDAD as of 29th April.
163deaths/10170cases*100=1.603 death rate.
So for every 100 people contracting the Vid 1.603 STATISTICALLY should die.
If we assume a population of 1.5M people then STATISTICALLY around 24045 people should die if every single person in Trinidad contracts Covid.
So we have a situation where 1475955 people are suffering because 24045 people may die but in reality only 163 have died.
1.5M people minus 1% suffering because 163 have died.
In one year we average around 400 deaths from crime but none of you do do anything meaningful about it besides complain on the internet.
In over a year 163 people have died from a Virus but you ok with taking these drastic lockdown measures?
What facts exactly are you people basing your decisions on? Truly I would love to know.
Skanky wrote:For those who say things like 'my head too hard for mats' let me help you. Decisions are made based on data, numbers and what you know and shouldn't be made on emotions and what the news says.
So let's deal with Trinidad, facts and what we know about this 'deadly' disease in TRINIDAD as of 29th April.
163deaths/10170cases*100=1.603 death rate.
So for every 100 people contracting the Vid 1.603 STATISTICALLY should die.
If we assume a population of 1.5M people then STATISTICALLY around 24045 people should die if every single person in Trinidad contracts Covid.
So we have a situation where 1475955 people are suffering because 24045 people may die but in reality only 163 have died.
1.5M people minus 1% suffering because 163 have died.
In one year we average around 400 deaths from crime but none of you do do anything meaningful about it besides complain on the internet.
In over a year 163 people have died from a Virus but you ok with taking these drastic lockdown measures?
What facts exactly are you people basing your decisions on? Truly I would love to know.
What leads to an overwhelmed health sector?teems1 wrote:Skanky wrote:For those who say things like 'my head too hard for mats' let me help you. Decisions are made based on data, numbers and what you know and shouldn't be made on emotions and what the news says.
So let's deal with Trinidad, facts and what we know about this 'deadly' disease in TRINIDAD as of 29th April.
163deaths/10170cases*100=1.603 death rate.
So for every 100 people contracting the Vid 1.603 STATISTICALLY should die.
If we assume a population of 1.5M people then STATISTICALLY around 24045 people should die if every single person in Trinidad contracts Covid.
So we have a situation where 1475955 people are suffering because 24045 people may die but in reality only 163 have died.
1.5M people minus 1% suffering because 163 have died.
In one year we average around 400 deaths from crime but none of you do do anything meaningful about it besides complain on the internet.
In over a year 163 people have died from a Virus but you ok with taking these drastic lockdown measures?
What facts exactly are you people basing your decisions on? Truly I would love to know.
For every person who has died, how many are in serious or critical condition?
How many are having difficulty breathing, requiring oxygen and worst case a ventilator?
How many of those recovered would have a lowered quality of life?
How many beds are in use right now due to these cases?
It's not just about death toll, you have to look at the effects on the healthcare sector and mitigate the factors which would overwhelm it.
Some "doctor" you must be. My mum is 88 and has heart and respiratory issues and diabetes, and mum in law has diabetes, as well as her sisters who live with her have blood pressure issues. What kind of human would I be if I did not take the vaccine at the first opportunity, knowing that if I spread it by them, worse yet a variant, that it would kill them?drchaos wrote:BUG wrote:drchaos wrote:BUG wrote:drchaos wrote:BUG wrote:Lol, wrong again "Dr". Since you have so much trouble reading (odd that, for a supposed, self described "Dr"?) Here is my OP from the vaccine thread detailing my experience receiving the vaccine two weeks ago:BUG wrote:For what it's worth, my wife and I had the Oxford/AstraZeneca first dose last week. Other than a mild headache and sore shoulder (from the shot) the next day, I was fine, even able to complete my regular 1 1/2 hr HIIT sessions the day of and day after the dose. My wife had chills and body aches and really didnt feel well for about 10 hours until, in her words "it was like someone just switched it off and I felt better immediately."[/quote
So from a mere mention that I have been first dose vaccinated, you diagnose me as being "old and suffering from comorbidities due to my lifestyle"? I don't know about you, but I sure don't know any old, sick people who partake in daily 1 1/2 hour HIIT sessions? I'm fit, young, healthy and for that I'm grateful.
No medical professional worth their salt jumps to wild conclusions based off zero information like that nor has such a hard time with basic research, reading and comprehension skills. Stop LARPing as a medical professional on an anonymous internet forum. It may seem like fun for you to troll people, but it is extremely dangerous to those gullible enough to listen to your nonsense. You may end up hurting someone or someone's family with your lies. Please stop.
Ahh so you are not old and and in-firmed.
You are a young and healthy person that jumped the line for the limited number of vaccines that are available in T&T, since the mandate is to vaccinate our old and at risk first.
Potentially denying two doses of vaccine to two at risk people who may need it more than you, since you believe in the viral vector vaccine.
Wonderful human being you seem to be.
You can't imagine a scenario, ANY scenario, where a young, fit and healthy person would be required to be vaccinated as a priority? My word You know if you use braincells to think for yourself it's not like you use them and then they're gone, right?
I shouldn't be surprised though, LARPing doesn't require intelligence, it only requires a wild imagination.
The death of two people are on your dirty hands bug. Young fit and healthy people, jumping the line and preventing the most vulnerable from being protected.
Try to excuse it as much as you want but as you said you are young fit and healthy which means your are low risk.
Disgusting excuse for a human being.
Unintelligent AND classless. You are the perfect stereotype of someone LARPing as a medical professional on an anonymous forum. I would feel sorry for you if your rhetoric wasn't so dangerous.
Classless is jumping the line for a vaccine meant to protect the most vulnerable.
You have blood on your hands, projecting that other people are dangerous when you put people's lives in danger by denying vaccines to the frail and elderly.
Its just getting sad now ... Admitting you are young/fit and then admitting to jumping to the line to vaccinate yourself and your wife. Probably gonna make up some outrageous lie next to cover up the fact that you admitting to breaking rules and regulations meant to protect people.
SHAME!
SHAME!
SHAME!
Ding Ding!
Skanky wrote:It's interesting to note that my post is the only one to contain facts derived from easily verifiable public data and a simple primary school calculation......whereas all the rebuttals to my argument in favour of the pro lockdowners are all based on speculation about what people think should happen and how one should feel, with no data or facts to back them up.
Fact vs speculation/feeling.
I know which one I would choose to inform my decision making process.
There is absolutely no dispute from me with respect to your data. In fact I will say again your analysis is sound.Skanky wrote:It's interesting to note that my post is the only one to contain facts derived from easily verifiable public data and a simple primary school calculation......whereas all the rebuttals to my argument in favour of the pro lockdowners are all based on speculation about what people think should happen and how one should feel, with no data or facts to back them up.
Fact vs speculation/feeling.
I know which one I would choose to inform my decision making process.
Skanky wrote:It's interesting to note that my post is the only one to contain facts derived from easily verifiable public data and a simple primary school calculation......whereas all the rebuttals to my argument in favour of the pro lockdowners are all based on speculation about what people think should happen and how one should feel, with no data or facts to back them up.
Fact vs speculation/feeling.
I know which one I would choose to inform my decision making process.
Skanky wrote:Here's something else those gripped by fear won't realize either.
A few weeks ago our death rate was 1.67 as of today our death rate is 1.6.
Our death rate has decreased over a few weeks. It's not absolutely significant nor statistically significant as it's only one data point but it's a step in the right direction.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], venom21 and 115 guests