Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
MONGO wrote:I tried a skar 8" in a tilin a while back...driver is not suitable as meccalli said. Alot of peaks and dips in response along with subwoofer phasing issues.
MONGO wrote:The one i built was tapered, cone area at throat to 1/2 cone area at mouth but not sure if it was properly designed it was when i was a beginner to horn response.
meccalli wrote:Martin King's work was on mass loaded lines and tqwt's
meccalli wrote:however there was much success using the older formula ( this old design is what he heard that made him interested), conclusions were drawn after modelling software became possible and preferable t/s parameters observed. I can take a woofer of suitable t/s (low fs, qts, qes) woofer, input 20% more sd as a constant taper and line length based on the quarter wavelength of Fs @(340m/s) @ 0.25 driver position in line length and get damn close to the best response I can in hornresp. Try it!
meccalli wrote:Bjorn on diy always designs mltl's but I don't see the difference being significant to a 4th order ported. An mltl is practically your standard quarter wave tube with a *port.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests