Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
smaharaj wrote:ok i hear people talking bout audio que,so i guess i can giv a little input on dis cause i have,HDC3 copper coil,
dis sub is underated first off,with the correct box dis sub can take 2000 rms daily,sub is 44 puonds,magnet is bigger dan the DDs 3500 but smaller than the 9500 (what does magnet size mean?),the bl factor is higher on the DDs,the sub came very stiff,it was more stiff than a jugg,there is no terminals on the sub,just like a DDs wires come straight from the leads,i did alot of research on dis sub,the soft parts are not like DDs,the DDs are higher grade compared 2 these,compared to the 3500 the HDC3 are louder,the HDC3 will be louder dan the 9500 under 2000rms,but over that the 9500 will be louder,thses sub loves big ports,so dont go putting dem lil ports (tell me more),on sound qulity,the sub did not sound as clean as other subs,on a tunning of 40,it hit all the lows,had no problem (sound quality, lows @ a 40hz tuning freq?),i had dis playing on a soundstream 2000 picaso the sub was jus warm after hours of playing,the subs hits the higher tone alot better than oder subs,downfall is as i said before is sound quality,if u not into to much sound qulity and looking for dutty bass,audio que HDC3 will do d job
p.s-------the guys who owns and design audio que is the father of the guy who owns DDs
(...Rovin...) wrote:1 - OP good intention for a review but posted wrong section
2 - its hard to understand ur post : also use fullstops , paragraphs , spell check , just press 1 more letter instead of typing "2" so that its : "to"
3 - what do u mean by "on sound quality the sub did not sound as clean as other subs " yet "it hit all the lows" ?
not trying to fack u up or anything but just trying to understand what u mean ...
viking1705 wrote:have used both the 10" and 15" model in these subs and sound quality and bass reproduction is not bad at all.I will play very smoothly in the right box so i guess your box wasnt best suited if you found it played rough..
The only problem i have with them is that the coil can not handle too much stress it overheats and burns once its being overpowered.If you remain within rec power handling its well worth the money.The soft parts are preety good for the price of the sub i love the suspension and cone.
smaharaj wrote:ok y wud a mono have a high pass? its called a sub sonic filter and if u read good u will see i said dat i cut port dat y d subsonic is on 35,the box i had b4 subsonic was on 25,even if u research it online u will see the sun will do 2000 daily I thought this is your review? ,the power acustic db an picaso carry the same bored that dont say squat, a lot of amps have the same board but the components are different making the amps different,and yes,sum1 did do a bench test and came out with close to 1700rms with music or a test tone?,u d first who said dat u cant over power the sub? I never said that if dats d case it should be classes with the dds 1500,in terms of loudess and power handling its class above the 3500 and below the 9500,u tink 72 inches is 2 much for dat sub??u must be joking, I said for the enclosure it is. tell me, whats the length like?
mongo wrote:where you tested it?
Is a totally different response in a room to a car.
You can experiment with port area it doesn't have to follow 12-16Square inches per cubic foot.
(...Rovin...) wrote:46hz u say u sure that bass eh sounding like beatin ah crix pan ? , better u put back d AI sub in ur car & listen to some actual lows ...
even when i used to compete in gallery i never tuned so high ...
Return to “I.C.E. / Car Audio Tech”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests